0
The basis for the Miranda v. Arizona ruling is the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from self-incrimination. In the 1966 decision, the Supreme Court held that individuals taken into police custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. This ruling established the "Miranda rights," ensuring that suspects are aware of their constitutional protections when facing interrogation.
What else can I help you with?
Which amendment was the basis of the Supreme Court's Miranda decision?
5, 6, and 14.
What two amendments were involved in the Miranda v Arizona case?
The basis for the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) was protection of Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.ExplanationThe Miranda rights actually are not a Constitutional Amendment. They are based on a Supreme Court case, Miranda v. Arizona(1966).In this case, Ernest Miranda had confessed to robbery and attempted rape, and this confession was offered as evidence in court to convict him. However, the Fifth Amendment guarantees that an accused person must not be compelled to testify against himself, and the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial by jury and to legal counsel. The Supreme Court overturned Miranda's conviction, stating:"The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he has the right to remain silent, and that anything he says will be used against him in court; he must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation, and that, if he is indigent, a lawyer will be appointed to represent him."Essentially, those accused of a crime must be informed of their rights (to remain silent and to have a lawyer) when they are arrested, before being questioned by the police.So, Miranda rights are not the direct result of a Constitutional Amendment, but they are based off of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.UpdateThe Miranda ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for Berghuis v. Thompkins,08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must demonstrably invoke his right to remain silent (by actually stating he wants to remain silent), rather than simply waive it.
Informing suspects of their legal rights during an arrest procedure is required as a result of?
The U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona is the basis for the procedure of informing suspects of their legal rights during arrest. As a matter of fact, the reading of these rights is commonly called the Miranda Warning.
What was the basis for what amendment to the constitution?
The 13th Proclamation.
Lincolin's emancipation proclamation eventually became the basis for the the amendment to the constitution?
13 the amendment
The right to vote cannot be denied on the basis of gender and according to which amendment?
The 19th amendment A+
Which amendment Prohibits the government from denying a person right to vote on the basis of race?
The fifteenth amendment of the Constitution.
Lincoln's emancipation proclamation eventually became the basis for what amendment to the constitution?
The Thirteenth (13) Amendment
What proclamation was the basis for what amendment to the constitution?
The 13th Proclamation.
Are gays and lesbians in Arizona protected by law against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation?
There are no state laws in Arizona which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The emancipation proclamination became the basis for what amendment?
The Emancipation Proclamation was the eventual basis for the Thirteenth Amendment and was ratified in 1865. The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Abraham Lincoln.
What is the limitation in the constitution as to what can be the basis of an amendment?
It must still be constitutional
