answersLogoWhite

0

Congressmen from the South generally opposed the Missouri Compromise, viewing it as a threat to the institution of slavery. They were particularly concerned about the restriction of slavery in new territories, which they believed undermined their economic interests and political power. Southern legislators argued that the compromise set a dangerous precedent for limiting slavery's expansion, fearing it would lead to increased abolitionist sentiment and jeopardize their way of life. Overall, Southern opposition reflected their commitment to maintaining and expanding slavery as an integral part of their society and economy.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When Missouri Compromise happened?

Under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 Missouri was admitted as a slave state and Maine as a free state.


Who was the known as the great comprimiser?

Henry Clay, The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1820


What earlier treaty involving slavery did the Kansas-Nebraska Act nullify?

The Missouri Compromise I think


What compromises did the government make leading up to the US Civil War?

There were a number of compromises made in the US leading up to the US Civil War. The list is as follows:1. In order to have the new US Constitution ratified, slavery was not slated for abolishment, but the importation of slaves would be illegal after 10 years. ( this was a hollow deal as slaves continued to be imported under cover) 2. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 to keep the balance of slave and free states equal; 3. The Missouri Compromise of 1850, this also to keep the slave-free state balance, but added the Fugitive Slave Law; and 4. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowing citizens to vote on the slave issue when a territory had yet to apply for statehood.


What direction does the Missouri River flow west to east and north to south?

the south i think


What effect did the Dred Scott Supreme Court case have on Dred Scott's freddom and on the Missouri Compromise?

Scott didn't win his freedom and the decision reinforced the idea that slaves were property. The Missouri Compromise was a blow to the southern states to gain more slave states. I don't think the Scott decision added anything to the compromise, but it did entrench slavery in the states where it existed.


What does Jefferson think will be the result of The Missouri Compromise?

The ageing Thomas Jefferson thought it was only a superficial solution, and that it would one day split the nation in two.


Why do you think the north and south were not able to reach a compromise over slavery in 1861?

Because the north and the south wanted differnt things south wanted slavery, but the north wanted freedom.


What were the benefits of the Missouri Compromise of 1820?

It kept the peace for thirty years - so it benefited both sides. Ironically both sides were dissatisfied with it, but at least they were equally dissatisfied, and it managed to keep the balance.


What does congressmen Chris Van Hollen think about kids education?

no one knows


What issue did the Missouri Compromise temporarily resolve?

The western expansion of slavery and the balance between slave and free states in the Senate


Why doesn't Timothy Claimright say Maine shouldn't be involved in the Missouri Compromise?

Timothy Claimright did not want Maine to be associated with slavery. He felt that because of the Missouri compromise people would associated slavery with Maine, and they would not think of Maine as a strong free state. He also was strongly against slavery; he believed that freedom was a God givin right and did not wish to see the institution of slavery move westward.