Chimel v. California (1969) established the legal precedent that police may only search an arrestee's immediate vicinity without a warrant to prevent the destruction of evidence or ensure officer safety. The Supreme Court ruled that a search of the entire home of an arrested individual violated the Fourth Amendment. This decision emphasized the importance of protecting individual rights against unwarranted searches and the need for law enforcement to obtain a warrant for broader searches.
US V. Mendenhall (Cause I just took a CRJ test and got the answer wrong cause someone said it was "Chimel V. California" and that's what I put)
There is ample justification for a search of the arrestee's person and the area "within his immediate control" meaning the area from within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.
chimel v. califorina
chimel v. califorina
Tony Chimel is 6' 1".
Tony Chimel was born on October 11, 1967.
Tony Chimel was born on October 11, 1967.
Tony Chimel is 43 years old (birthdate: October 11, 1967).
It established a stronger allowance for police to search suspects. It held that trash can be searched without warrant. Wikipedia dat!
In Chimel v. California (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court held that law enforcement officers may conduct a warrantless search of an arrestee's immediate vicinity, defined as the area within their control, to protect officer safety and prevent evidence destruction. However, the Court ruled that searches extending beyond this area, such as a room in the home where the arrest took place, require a warrant. The decision emphasized the need to balance individual privacy rights with police authority during arrests.
To establish a route in California.
You move to California and establish residency there.