0
Which Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?
chimel v. califorina
What else can I help you with?
Which us supreme court cases was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?
chimel v. califorina
What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?
The US Supreme Court has declined to extend the exclusionary rule to searches conducted by whom?
The Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted by school administrators.
The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?
exclusionary rule
The supreme court has adopted the exclusionary rule to protect citizens from?
illegal searches
In deciding cases involving laws that punish sedition the Supreme Court has developed the?
exclusionary rule
In what year did the US Supreme Court extend the exclusionary rule to the States?
1961The US Supreme Court extended the exclusionary rule to the state as a result of their decision in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961). The rule was originally created and applied to the federal government in Weeks v. US, (1914).
Which court is responsible for enforcement of fundamental rights?
supreme court and high court
What governmental body is responsible for interpreting the Constitution?
The federal courts of the Judicial Branch are responsible for interpreting the US Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States (also commonly called the US Supreme Court), head of the Judicial branch of government, is the highest authority on constitutional interpretation.A. Supreme Court
Who is responsible of checks and balances of the president?
congress and the supreme court
Which 1960s U.S. Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level?
The 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that made the exclusionary rule applicable to state criminal prosecutions is Mapp v. Ohio. In this landmark decision, the Court held that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, cannot be used in state courts. This ruling extended the exclusionary rule, previously applicable only to federal cases, to the states, reinforcing the protection of individual rights against unlawful government actions.
