The Anti-Imperialist League opposed intervention in Cuba primarily on the grounds of promoting self-determination and opposing Imperialism. They argued that annexing territories went against American democratic principles and moral values, emphasizing that the U.S. should not impose its will on other nations. Additionally, they feared that such actions could lead to the expansion of militarism and entanglement in foreign conflicts, undermining domestic liberties. The League also highlighted the economic and ethical implications of imperialism, advocating for a focus on domestic issues instead.
For moral and practical reasons.
for moral and practical reason (APEX) hope it HELPS
They opposed intervention for moral and practical reasons.
They opposed intervention for moral and practical reasons.
for moral and practical reason (APEX) hope it HELPS
for moral and practical reason (APEX) hope it HELPS
The Anti-Imperialist League opposed intervention in Cuba primarily because its members believed that such actions would violate the principles of self-determination and democracy. They argued that the United States should not impose its will on other nations, viewing imperialism as morally wrong and contrary to American ideals. Additionally, they expressed concerns about the potential costs of war and the consequences of expanding U.S. territorial ambitions. Ultimately, they advocated for a policy of non-intervention and respect for Cuba's sovereignty.
Andrew Carnegie objected to US intervention in Cuba.
The expansion by intervening in Cuba and other areas is the underlying aspects of Imperialism, since these increase the number of territories dependent on American military power or control. As Anti-Imperialists, these actions would accordingly be opposed.
Andrew Carnegie
Teller amendment?
45 cents