...
La casa de Sullivan.
believed that all people were created equal and had equal rights and that the government had to uphold these rights
The People.
Claudius and Gertrude
It depends on what you wish to say. If you need the plural form, you do NOT add an apostrophe, simply an "s". Thus, Mr & Mrs. Sullivan are "the Sullivans". If you need to make that plural form possessive, that is, to speak about something that belongs to the Sullivans, you add an apostrophe AFTER the "s" of the plural. So,you would say "The meeting is at the Sullivans' house" or, more briefly, "The meeting [or just "It"[ is at the Sullivans". The form "Sullivan's" is the SINGULAR + possessive (formed with apostrophe-s). Thus, you would say "This is John Sullivan's book." It is very unlikely you would use the expression "the Sullivan's" in this case. (In other words, there is little or no use for "the Sullivan's".)
No definitely not. and don't ever say that to a New Zealander.
they have the power in their blood and they have the power to say their ancestors are gods.
because racekar ;)
tell him he's the next jimmy Sullivan
O'Sullivan highlights that Mexico's capacity to govern is challenged by various factors, including corruption, weak institutions, and significant drug-related violence. He emphasizes that these issues undermine the rule of law and hinder effective governance. Additionally, O'Sullivan points out that while Mexico has made progress in some areas, the persistence of these challenges continues to affect the government's legitimacy and functionality.
to the best of your ability
René Descartes did not specifically say that people could not govern themselves. However, he did emphasize the role of reason and rationality in self-governance and believed that individuals should strive to attain self-knowledge and self-mastery through the use of critical thinking and reflection.