0
What internal and external factors after Charlemagne death weakened kingdoms in Europe?
After Charlemagne's death in 814, internal factors such as the fragmentation of his empire due to succession issues and the lack of a strong central authority contributed to its decline. Externally, invasions from Vikings, Magyars, and Saracens destabilized regions, leading to further disintegration. Additionally, the rise of local feudal lords diminished the power of centralized governance, as local allegiances took precedence over loyalty to the emperor. Together, these factors led to the weakening of kingdoms across Europe.
What else can I help you with?
How were the Frankish kingdoms destroyed?
The Frankish kingdoms were gradually weakened and ultimately destroyed due to a combination of internal strife, succession disputes, and external pressures. The Treaty of Verdun in 843 divided the empire among Charlemagne's grandsons, leading to fragmentation and infighting. This division made the kingdoms vulnerable to invasions from Viking, Magyar, and Saracen forces. Over time, these factors contributed to the decline of centralized authority and the rise of feudalism, further destabilizing the region.
What happened after the death of Charlemagne?
Charlemagne’s sons fought for power and weakened the kingdom
What external factors weakened the mali empire?
the umayyads
What were the two major internal problems that weakened the Roman empire?
mexico
What promblems in the Inca empire weakened the Incas for spanish conquest?
Some problems that weakened the Inca Empire were internal civil wars over succession, a smallpox epidemic that devastated the population, and a lack of immunity to European diseases brought by the Spanish. Additionally, the empire's vast size made it difficult to govern effectively and respond quickly to external threats.
What are the many reasons historains give for the fall of the roman empire?
It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.
How did the Peace of Westphalia weaken the Catholic Church's power?
It recognized the right of kingdoms to practice Protestantism.
What external problems weakened the Roman Empire that led to its fall?
The inexorable move of Eurasian peoples across the Empire.
What weakened the cities of Sumerian?
Several factors weakened the Sumerian cities, including external invasions by neighboring peoples such as the Akkadians and the Elamites. Natural disasters like floods and droughts also posed challenges to agriculture and urban life. Additionally, internal conflicts and political instability contributed to the decline of Sumerian cities.
The Persian Empire was eventually weakened by?
Their loss in the Greco-Persian War as well as internal unrest within conquered lands.
What event before defeat by the Spanish had weakened the Incas?
Before their defeat by the Spanish, the Incas were significantly weakened by a civil war that erupted between the two sons of the deceased emperor Huayna Capac, Atahualpa and Huascar. This internal conflict divided the empire and drained resources, making it more vulnerable to external threats. Additionally, the spread of smallpox and other European diseases had already decimated the population, further destabilizing their society and governance.
Why did the mutapa state decline?
The Mutapa State declined due to a combination of factors, including internal power struggles, external attacks by the Portuguese, and the impact of the slave trade. This weakened the state's central authority and disrupted trade networks, leading to its eventual collapse.
