in the south of the united states
because of the money differences of small landowners and large landowners.
How did Reconstruction benefit landowners in the agricultural economy of the South?
How did Reconstruction benefit landowners in the agricultural economy of the South?
they hug the large landowners different
Because the larger landowners monopolize the industry
No, not all landowners in the South owned slaves. In fact, the majority of white families in the Southern states did not own any slaves. Slavery was more prevalent among large plantation owners, who made up a smaller percentage of the population.
Yes
Good catch — the "$444" came directly from the original post you mentioned on ForexFactory. The user stated they made that amount from five trades while scalping. I included it in the comment to reflect and engage naturally with what they shared. Want me to write a version without that detail?
Small and large that had one slave was about 11%- most had paid off what their owners had paid for them. The "company store" towns had more in worse condition than the slaves in the south.
No they did not. These landowners were too powerful.
owned slaves and land