Aristotle believed that democracy was prone to manipulation by demagogues and could lead to tyranny if the majority lacked virtue and wisdom. He favored a form of government known as polity, which combined elements of democracy and oligarchy, where power was held by a virtuous middle class.
Ancient Greece was not a country - it was comprised of over 2,000 independent city-states. These city-states each changed their form of government periodically as problems arose, ranging from monarchy, oligarchy, tyranny, limited democracy and radical democracy. As one form failed, another would be tried. For example, Athens went from monarchy to oligarchy, tyranny, limited democracy and radical democracy, then back to limited democracy. Sparta went from a dual monarchy to a combined monarchy-oligarchy to a combined monarchy-limited democracy.
Aristotle contributed to the development of democracy by laying out the principles of a mixed constitution, which combined elements of monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy to create a system that balanced the interests of the state and its citizens. He also emphasized the importance of citizenship and civic engagement in order to maintain a stable and effective democratic government.
Aristotle believed that the best form of government was a constitutional government, which combined elements of democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy. He valued a government that promoted the common good and balanced the interests of the ruling class and the general population.
Cicero believed in a form of government that balanced the power between different branches, promoting a mixed constitution that combined elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. He supported the idea of a republican government with a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny and ensure the protection of individual liberties.
Plato believed that philosopher-kings, individuals who possessed both wisdom and intellect, were the best rulers. Aristotle disagreed with this and instead supported a system of government led by a virtuous and educated middle class. Aristotle believed in a mixed form of government that combined elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy.
William Blackstone advocated for a constitutional government that emphasized the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. He believed in a balanced system that combined elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, ensuring that power was limited and accountable. His work laid the foundation for common law and influenced the development of legal systems that prioritize justice and liberty.
"Its learned" likely refers to a specific historical or philosophical figure, but without additional context, it's unclear who you mean. However, if you're referring to a thinker like Aristotle, he favored a government based on virtue and the rule of law, advocating for a mixed government that combined elements of democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy. This approach aimed to balance the interests of different social classes and ensure stability and justice in governance. If you have a specific individual in mind, please provide more details for a more tailored response.
He believed that if all three powers were combined the government would be too corrupt, therefore he believed that the executive body should be in the hands of a single person, the legislative in the hands of a group of people (less corruption) and the judiciary should be controlled by judges.
Cicero advocated for a return to the republican system of government in Rome, emphasizing the importance of the Senate and its role in providing stability and governance. He believed in balancing power among the elites and the Senate, rather than concentrating authority in the hands of a single ruler. Cicero was a proponent of a mixed government that combined elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, aiming to protect the Republic from tyranny and promote civic virtue.
Ancient Sparta had a unique form of government known as a mixed constitution, which combined elements of monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy. It was ruled by two hereditary kings from separate royal families, supported by a council of elders called the Gerousia, which included men over the age of 60. Additionally, the Apella, an assembly of male citizens, had the power to vote on certain issues, although their influence was limited compared to the Gerousia. This system aimed to balance power among different social classes and maintain stability within Spartan society.
no they was not