0
In the Massachusetts colonial government, participation was primarily limited to male landowners who met specific property requirements. This meant that only men who owned a certain amount of land could vote and hold office. Additionally, the government was heavily influenced by Puritan religious beliefs, which meant that church membership also played a role in political participation. Overall, the system favored a relatively small, elite group within the colony.
What else can I help you with?
In the Athens government who was allowed to participate in government?
the democratic citizens were allowed
Where were women allowed to participate in decision making in colonial times?
the other oe is not correct
Which people were allowed to participate in the government of Athens?
hi people i did not
Which people were allowed to participate in the government in Athens?
Adult male citizens.
What form of government was common between Greece and Rome and why was it significant?
Democracy allowed the citizens to participate in government.
What were women allowed to participate in decision making in Colonial America?
They weren't. They just did house work and made us sammiches.
Why weren't people allowed to participate in government during revolutionary war?
They did not have many right's back then so they were not allowed to do very much
Reduced creole power and allowed mestizos and Indians to participate fully in government?
Democratic citizens
Why were women not allowed to participate?
women were not allowed to participate in ancient greek
How would you describe the growth of representative government in Colonial America?
The growth of representative government in Colonial America was marked by the establishment of colonial assemblies, which allowed settlers to elect their own representatives and participate in local governance. Early examples include the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1619 and the Massachusetts General Court, both of which laid the groundwork for self-rule. Over time, these assemblies gained more power, asserting their authority over taxation and legislation, and fostering a sense of political identity among colonists. This evolution set the stage for the eventual push for independence and the creation of a more democratic framework in the United States.
What was different in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut from Massachusetts?
The Fundamental Orders of 1638-1639, established in Connecticut, differed from the Massachusetts Bay Colony's governing framework primarily in their emphasis on a more democratic structure and broader suffrage. While Massachusetts had a more theocratic approach, prioritizing church membership for voting rights, the Fundamental Orders allowed non-church members to participate in governance. Additionally, the Orders outlined a written constitution that explicitly defined the powers of government, whereas Massachusetts relied more on unwritten traditions and colonial charters. This made Connecticut's system more progressive for its time, promoting a greater separation between church and state.
Which people were allowed to participate in the government of the ancient Athens?
adult males whoms father had been an athen citizen
