Because if they build buildings and its a tourist attraction, then it would look like most of the country's on Earth, and wouldn't be special.
If Antarctica were a world park, It would be protected from HUMAN INTERFERENCE.
Antarctica, ok make it into a world wilderness park. Nobody cares.
nothing
Antarctica is already protected -- all land south of 60 degrees S -- by the Antarctic Treaty. There is no reason to add the burden of a world park designation to this geography.
basically 50 cent said no.
Antarctica is not a world park. All land and ice south of 60 degrees S is governed by the Antarctic Treaty (1961), which preserves the geography for the scientific study of the health of planet Earth.
Antarctica is the largest and coldest desert.
drive time.. its about 20 minutes once you leave the park
To affect a park badly, people can leave litter behind, trample the plants, feed or scare wildlife, and walk through flower beds.
There are fewer than 700 geysers in the world today and these geysers exist on every continent, apart from Antarctica. About half of the world's geysers can be found in Yellowstone Park.
They leave Chicago and head west to 'Wally World'.
yes, but there is some debate about whether is should not be a world park because it have very mineral rich soil underneath, which we now have the technology to get. This however, would make it a waste tip, so at the moment it's staying as a world park.