0
According to John Yoo's letter the Supreme Court allows warrantless searches or seizures only if?
Government interests are greater than the need to keep certain information private
What else can I help you with?
What duty does the government have that allows it to conduct warranties searches and seizures?
To protect its citizens from terrorist attacks
What was the outcome of the California vs. Greenwood case regarding the legality of warrantless searches and seizures of garbage left outside a person's home?
In the California vs. Greenwood case, the Supreme Court ruled that warrantless searches and seizures of garbage left outside a person's home are legal. This means that law enforcement can search through someone's trash without a warrant because there is no expectation of privacy once the garbage is placed outside for collection.
According to John Yoo's letter the Supreme Court allows warrentless searches or seizures only if?
Government interests are greater than the need to keep certain information private.
List and explain four situations in which the US Supreme Court has ruled that a warrantless search is justified?
Warrantless searches can be performed when consent is given or there are exigent circumstances. An exigent circumstance is if the police feel that someone's safety is at risk or criminal activity is ongoing. Two other conditions are the plain view doctrine and incidental searches.
What does Carroll vr US allow?
United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld the warrantless searches of an automobile, which is known as the automobile exception. The case has also been cited as widening the scope of warrantless search.
What 1978 Supreme Court case related to the impropriety of the warrantless collection of physical evidence at a homicide scene?
the 1978 supreme court case that related to the impropriety of the warrantless collection of physical evidence at a homicide scene is ?
What was the significance of the Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood in 1988?
In the 1988 Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood, the court ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not protect against warrantless searches of garbage left outside of a home. This decision established that individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their discarded trash, allowing law enforcement to search it without a warrant.
A warrantless search not incident to an arrest may be justified under the Supreme Court's exigent-circumstances doctrine?
true
What supreme Court case protects overnight guest in the home against warrantless search?
Miranda v. Arizona
What was the argument of both parties in Carroll v US case?
In Carroll v. United States (1925), the government argued that the warrantless search of the defendant's automobile was justified due to the inherent mobility of vehicles and the need to prevent the destruction of evidence. The defense contended that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applied, arguing that a warrant should be required to conduct a search. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government, establishing the "automobile exception" to the warrant requirement.
Why did Katz sue the US?
Katz sued the U.S. government primarily over the legality of wiretapping. He argued that the FBI had violated his Fourth Amendment rights by conducting warrantless surveillance of his phone calls, which he claimed were private communications. The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court, leading to a landmark decision that affirmed the need for a warrant for wiretaps, reinforcing privacy rights against government intrusion. This ruling established the principle that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just places, from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The US Supreme Court has declined to extend the exclusionary rule to searches conducted by whom?
The Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted by school administrators.
