0
What else can I help you with?
What supreme court case protects overnight guests in the home of another against warrentless searches?
Minnesota v. Carter
What 1978 Supreme Court case related to the impropriety of the warrantless collection of physical evidence at a homicide scene?
the 1978 supreme court case that related to the impropriety of the warrantless collection of physical evidence at a homicide scene is ?
A warrantless search not incident to an arrest may be justified under the Supreme Court's exigent-circumstances doctrine?
true
What are facts about the Marshall v Barlow's search and seizure case?
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) conducted a warrantless search of Barlow's business claimiing the authority to do so under its regulatory powers. Supreme Court ruled against OSHA in this circumstance but did NOT totally rule out all no-notification, warrantless, regulatory-type searches.See below link:
What does Carroll vr US allow?
United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld the warrantless searches of an automobile, which is known as the automobile exception. The case has also been cited as widening the scope of warrantless search.
Who protects the pyramids of Giza?
Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities
What was the significance of the Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood in 1988?
In the 1988 Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood, the court ruled that the Fourth Amendment does not protect against warrantless searches of garbage left outside of a home. This decision established that individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their discarded trash, allowing law enforcement to search it without a warrant.
What does the US Supreme Court protect?
The US Supreme Court upholds and protects the integrity of the Constitution, at least in theory.
According to John Yoo's letter the Supreme Court allows warrantless searches or seizures only if?
Government interests are greater than the need to keep certain information private
List and explain four situations in which the US Supreme Court has ruled that a warrantless search is justified?
Warrantless searches can be performed when consent is given or there are exigent circumstances. An exigent circumstance is if the police feel that someone's safety is at risk or criminal activity is ongoing. Two other conditions are the plain view doctrine and incidental searches.
Why did Katz sue the US?
Katz sued the U.S. government primarily over the legality of wiretapping. He argued that the FBI had violated his Fourth Amendment rights by conducting warrantless surveillance of his phone calls, which he claimed were private communications. The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court, leading to a landmark decision that affirmed the need for a warrant for wiretaps, reinforcing privacy rights against government intrusion. This ruling established the principle that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just places, from unreasonable searches and seizures.
In Schmerber v. California the Supreme Court when police ordered a doctor to draw blood from a suspect charged with drunken driving?
In Schmerber v. California, the Supreme Court held that the warrantless blood test was allowed due to the exigent circumstances of alcohol metabolizing in the blood. The court balanced the suspect's Fourth Amendment rights against the need for accurate blood alcohol evidence in DUI cases.
