Americans justified expansion from coast to coast through the ideology of Manifest Destiny, which held that it was their divine right and duty to spread democracy and civilization across the continent. This belief was often accompanied by the notion that American culture and institutions were superior, leading to the idea that expansion would benefit both the nation and the territories acquired. Additionally, economic motivations, such as the desire for land, resources, and new markets, played a significant role in supporting the expansionist agenda. This justification often overlooked or dismissed the rights and cultures of Indigenous peoples and other nations.
To justify the expansion to the detriment of the native Americans.
Manifest Destiny was a 19th-century belief that Americans had a duty to expand and settle the continent from coast to coast. This idea was used to justify territorial expansion, often at the expense of Native American tribes and other groups already living on the land.
Turner said that colonial expansion served the purpose that the frontier had for earlier Americans
Support westward expansion to the Pacific.
Turner said that colonial expansion served the purpose that the frontier had for earlier Americans.
Turner said that colonial expansion served the purpose that the frontier had for earlier Americans.
The belief that Americans had a God-given right to expand across the continent from the East Coast to the West Coast is known as Manifest Destiny. This 19th-century doctrine held that it was the divine mission of the United States to spread democracy and civilization. It was used to justify westward expansion, often at the expense of Native American lands and cultures. Manifest Destiny reflected a sense of American exceptionalism and fueled territorial acquisitions, such as the annexation of Texas and the Oregon Trail migration.
It wasn't! The Western Expansion happened because of opportunity and greed. If the Native Americans hadn't been so nice we (white people) would still be confined to the east coast.
It wasn't! The Western Expansion happened because of opportunity and greed. If the Native Americans hadn't been so nice we (white people) would still be confined to the east coast.
well i have a question regarding the Darwinists i would like to now how they justify expansionism? thank you
Yes, Social Darwinist ideas were used to justify policies of imperial expansion by suggesting that it was natural for stronger nations to dominate weaker ones. This concept was applied to justify the acquisition of resources and territories through military conquest.
The Mexican-American War.