Do you agree with Webster decision to try to search a compromise to prevent secession
The founding fathers were before Andrew Jackson.
Calhoun believed that the federal government did not have the power to ban slavery, while Webster believed the government did have this power.
Calhoun supported State's rights and Jackson favored Strong Government
I don't frickin' know
False
Presidents Lincoln and Jackson had different views on laws they believed were unconstitutional. President Lincoln believed that it was his duty to enforce laws he believed were unconstitutional and work for their repeal. President Jackson, on the other hand, believed that such laws could be broken and then hopefully have the US Supreme Court rule on their constitutionality.
Webster and Haynes differ primarily in their approaches to language and communication. Webster often emphasizes clarity and precision in language use, advocating for standardization in grammar and vocabulary. On the other hand, Haynes tends to focus on the nuances of language and the importance of context, highlighting how meaning can shift based on cultural and situational factors. These contrasting perspectives reflect broader debates in linguistics about the balance between structure and fluidity in language.
All the apostles were special. However, St. Andrew has the distinction of being the first apostle chosen by Our Lord.
Because they wanted money for their houses
Because they wanted money for their houses
Daniel is a Hebrew name meaning "God is my Judge" ^-^
John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster were senators in the 1800s who represented South Carolina and Massachusetts, respectively. Around this time was the civil war and slavery. Calhoun believed in expansionism, and was pro-slavery in the interest of southern economics, wanting power in the state to be strongest. Webster focused on northern interests, and saw value in the federal government's power growing.