Regents of the University of California vs Bakke affirmed affirmative action by ruling it as entirely constitutional. This allowed for affirmative action programs to have a clear set of laws and regulations regarding their behavior and rights.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
Regents of University of California v. Bakke
The web address of the Regents Of The University Of Colorado is: www.colorado.edu/ocg/
Allan Bakke claimed he was a victim of reverse discrimination.
In Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Alan Bakke, who had applied to the University and been rejected, sued the Regents claiming that his civil rights as a white had been denied by the University's policy of affirmative action for non--white applicants. Affirmative action, he argued, violated the Civil RIghts Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination by the federal government or any program (such as a state university) that receives federal funding. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action was constitutionally allowed so long as race was only one of several factors taken into account by admissions officers, but that strict quotas that could apply regardless of qualifications violated the law.
The board of regents
The address of the Regents Of The University Of Colorado is: 3100 Marine Street - Room 479, Boulder, CO 80303-1058
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
yes the university of Westminster it is in regents street.
The court ruled that the use of racial quotas in college admissions was unconstitutional Source; study island
In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the defendant, the University of California, argued that its affirmative action program was necessary to promote diversity within the student body and to remedy past discrimination against minority groups. They contended that the program aimed to create a more equitable educational environment and prepare students for a multicultural society. The university maintained that its admissions policies were designed to achieve these goals without outright quotas, which they claimed were not the sole basis for admissions decisions.
In Bakke v Regents of the University of California, Alan Bakke, who had applied to the University and been rejected, sued the Regents claiming that his civil rights as a white had been denied by the University's policy of affirmative action for non--white applicants. Affirmative action, he argued, violated the Civil RIghts Act of 1964, which forbids racial discrimination by the federal government or any program (such as a state university) that receives federal funding. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action was constitutionally allowed so long as race was only one of several factors taken into account by admissions officers, but that strict quotas that could apply regardless of qualifications violated the law.