He wanted lasting peace and fairness. the other three members wanted the central powers to pay.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
m
well first Germany wanted to have everything for themselves, and they wanted to kidnap every women so they can have sex with each and every one
well first Germany wanted to have everything for themselves, and they wanted to kidnap every women so they can have sex with each and every one
I think you just answered your own question. There is definitely a difference between the two. Roosevelt was obviously a tougher person and believed in a strong military and didn't care as much about morals during war.
European Allied leaders, particularly French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau and British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, favored harsh penalties for Germany to prevent future aggression and ensure reparations. In contrast, President Woodrow Wilson advocated for a more lenient approach, emphasizing reconciliation and the establishment of a stable international order through his Fourteen Points. Wilson believed that excessive punishment could lead to resentment and future conflicts, while European leaders prioritized security and accountability for Germany's role in the war. This fundamental difference in perspective shaped the negotiations at the Treaty of Versailles.
he is the leader of assassination supreme court
he allowed slavey
Tuskegee institute.
Wilson promised to preserve free economis competition