it makes laws clarifed
The justices of the US Supreme Court vote on each case that is brought before them. The decision of the court is whatever a majority of the justices agree on. Each justice has an equal say in the decision.
Since Roosevelt is long dead, I assume this is a homework question.
The person who is chosen will most likely be on the bench for 30 or more years. They make decisions that affect all our lives. An example of a Supreme Court decision would be Brown v Topika Board of education. This decision made intergration of schools possible. The Miranda decision came from the Supreme Court in reading rights to persons who are arrested. Roe v Wade concerning abortion is an case. As you can see they make some important decisions that affect all of us. Not all cases are heard before the court, but those that do get there can change laws.
Well, his appointment of Joihn Marshall as Chief Justice is considered to have been important for asserting the influence of the Supreme Court.
the consumer economic decisions can affect the price and supply of a commodity
They may have some feedback or thoughts for the president, but they have no say in the matter whatsoever. The president and the president alone nominates people for vacant supreme court seats, and then the senate approves or rejects the nominee.
It depends entirely on which court decisions are being discussed. Please resubmit the question with the names of the relevant cases.
There are no witnesses or juries at either the Supreme Court OR the Courts Of Appeal. They hear only cases which have already been tried at the lower level of the judicial system and their rulings affect the decisions rendered at that level of the system.
The lower court decision from the highest court that reviewed the case becomes final and legally binding.
What boundaries can slow down the CCC and how can it affect managerial decisions?
No one is able to be entirely impartial in their opinions, and Supreme Court Justices are no exception. Presidents usually nominate candidates who exhibit the same biases as the President, and Congress usually confirms them based on the congressional makeup at the time.In the case of President Bush, he nominated conservative candidates, who were confirmed by a conservative Congress. It is reasonable to assume that President Obama will be more liberal in his choices, which will likely be confirmed by the present generally-liberal Congress.We may expect that Bush's nominees will continue to apply their conservative philosophies to their decisions, and that they will be in some respects opposed by any future appointees from President Obama, and vice versa. In any case, the court and their decisions tend to even out over time.