That is the correct spelling of "rehireable" (able to be rehired, or re-employed).
The term "rehireable" refers to a former employee who is eligible to be hired back by their previous employer. This designation typically indicates that the employee left the company on good terms, with a positive performance record and no significant issues. Being classified as rehireable can enhance an individual's employability within the same organization in the future.
The term "rehireable" refers to an employee who is eligible to be hired again by a company after leaving or being terminated. This status typically indicates that the individual left on good terms and is considered a valuable asset, making them a favorable candidate for re-employment. Companies may have specific policies or criteria that determine whether a former employee is deemed rehireable.
The correct spelling is "rehireable." It is a compound word formed by combining "rehire" and the suffix "-able," indicating the ability to be rehired.
You can call the corporate human resources department or the manager of where you worked and ask if you are able to be rehired. Anyone can call and ask so if you aren't comfortable a friend can do this for you.
No. They can provide your dates of employment and your title. Most will not say whether you are rehireable or if you voluntarily quit. If you worked for the government at any level, these details may be available.
In the state of Texas an employer cannot divulge why the employee was fired, only if they are "rehireable" The fact that some one was FIRED is a red flag for most potential employers, regardless of the WHY of the situation. There are no federal statutes forbidding employers from saying what they want about former employees. State laws prohibit defamation (slander and libel), which is broadcasting false info about a person when the communication is not privileged. Honestly reporting that someone was fired can't be slander. Honestly reporting that someone was fired for absenteeism (etc.) can't be defamation either. A growing trend is state law that grants employers the same "privilege" as doctor-patient, or lawyer-client: what one employer says to another about a former employee can't be anyone else's business - not the courts', not the employee talked about. No defamation suit possible. Texas law provides that broad protection to employers. Washington is the latest state to add that to its laws.