answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

In what year was the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade decided?

The landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973.


Who decided whether or not the Supreme Court will review a cases?

who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case


A supreme court case must be decided by?

a simple majority


Can you write a sentence using the word supreme?

The supreme court decided to throw out the case.


Before their case is decided before the supreme court of the United states what must the parties to the case do?

Before their cases is decided before the Supreme court of the United States, the parties must make their final submissions.


What precedent did Marbury v. Madison set?

In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.


The supreme court case of munn v Illinois decided that?

the granger laws were legal


What did the Supreme Court decided in the case and what was President Jackson's response to the court ruling?

He took matters into his own hands


What city did the Supreme Court neet to decide the Dred Scott v Sanford case?

The Supreme Court met in Washington, D.C. when it decided the Dred Scott case. It has met in Washington for every case since February 1801.


What did Marbury v. Madison set?

In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.


How many years did it take the case law Stone v. Graham to reach the Unites States Supreme Court?

The case Stone v. Graham took about three years to reach the United States Supreme Court. The initial ruling occurred in 1979 when the Kentucky Supreme Court decided the case, and it was subsequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari in 1980. The Supreme Court ultimately issued its decision in 1980.


In the Dred Scott case the Supreme Court decided?

In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court decided that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens under the Constitution and therefore could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively invalidating the Missouri Compromise.