The Pilgrims, like many early European settlers, had limited understanding of mental health and disabilities. Children who exhibited signs of mental challenges were often marginalized, sometimes viewed as a result of sin or divine punishment. In some cases, they were cared for by their families, but there were also instances of abandonment or neglect. The societal attitudes of the time were largely shaped by religious beliefs and a lack of medical knowledge, leading to inconsistent and often harsh treatment of such individuals.
no
Yes, a person who is not mentally challenged can divorce a person who is mentally challenged would have to be proven they are mentally challenged), but they would have to let the courts decide in the provisions of the divorce what you would pay to help sustain the lifestyle of the mentally challenged person.
DisabledPhysically challenged (if physically disabled)Mentally challenged (if mentally challenged)SpecialOr even better:ChildrenWhy should you treat someone differently or call them any differently just because they are disabled? They are still children, disabled or not. Societies need to "label" people is getting out of hand.
Genetic Scientists have found that if second cousins marry then there is a much lower risk that any children they may have will not be mentally challenged or have any other birth defects.
No, there isn't any correlation between homosexuality and mentally challenged people.
"Mentally challenged" is a euphemism for mentally retarded, or having a low IQ or mental disabilities this means that someone who would be mentally challenged wouldn't do as well as their classmates. when your not physically disabled (wheelchair)
Same thing. It's just a twist of words. Mentally challenged is a euphemism for mentally retarded.
Mentally challenged or mentally handicapped
yep!
no.
no
NO