Lewis v. United States, 518 US 322 (1996)
In Lewis, the Supreme Court held defendants accused of petty crimes, even multiple petty crimes, do not have a right to trial by jury. Often, the determining factor is whether the sentence involves imprisonment of six months or less, or combined sentences of more than six months imprisonment. There are some exceptions to this rule, however.
In the opinion of the Court, Justice O'Connor wrote:
"The Sixth Amendment reserves the jury trial right to defendants accused of serious crimes. As set forth above, we determine whether an offense is serious by looking to the judgment of the legislature, primarily as expressed in the maximum authorized term of imprisonment. Here, by setting the maximum authorized prison term at six months, the Legislature categorized the offense of obstructing the mail as petty. The fact that petitioner was charged with two counts of a petty offense does not revise the legislative judgment as to the gravity of that particular offense, nor does it transform the petty offense into a serious one, to which the jury trial right would apply."
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment.
true
true
If your question refers to a state supreme court justice, and if your state provides for election to their supreme court rather than appointment, you can vote when you turn 18 (per the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution), provided you register properly before the election.If you are asking about US Supreme Court justices; they are nominated by the President and confirmed or rejected by Senate vote, not elected. The electorate (voting public) does not play a direct role in the appointment of justices to the US Supreme Court.
a court-appointed attorney if they could not afford one. This ruling established the right to counsel for indigent defendants and extended the protections of the Sixth Amendment to state proceedings.
In short, the question was whether assistance of counsel as ineffective when it leads to the rejection of an otherwise favorable plea offer. Because it involved the sixth amendment, the issue was constitutional.
Regardless of the seriousness of the offense if a defendant qualifies (usually by income level) for a Public Defender one will be appointed.
No, it's still constitutional to select jurors. In fact, most legal scholars consider them essential to fulfilling the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.
The Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to confront your accuser in court. It is just one of the rights guaranteed under due process.
The Twenty-sixth Amendment was passed in response to the US Supreme Court's decision in Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 US 112 (1970), where the court declared a section of the 1970 amendment to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 unconstitutional.The Twenty-sixth Amendment simply lowers the voting age from 21 to 18 by constitutional means because the Court held the federal government couldn't dictate voting regulations to states by legislation. The Amendment was ratified by the states on July 5, 1971, and has not been challenged.This is a regulatory Amendment that isn't amenable to special uses or limitations, except those that apply to voter eligibility, in general.Amendment XXVISection 1.The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age.Section 2.The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
AnswerTechnically, no amendment does. There is a precedent that was set in the US Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright,(1963) that clarifies that you have a right to a lawyer even if you don't have money for one. The amendment would be the Sixth though, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.AnswerThe Sixth Amendment provides the right to have an attorney. The right to a court-appointed attorney for people who couldn't afford to hire a private attorney was firmly established in the US Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright.
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT! In Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932),the Supreme Court ruled that "in a capital case, where the defendant is unable to employ counsel, and is incapable adequately of making his own defense because of ignorance, feeble mindedness, illiteracy, or the like, it is the duty of the court, whether requested or not, to assign counsel for him.