The defense of reasonable care, often invoked in negligence cases, argues that a defendant acted with the level of caution and prudence that a reasonable person would exhibit under similar circumstances. This defense contends that the defendant took appropriate measures to prevent harm and did not breach their duty of care. If successful, it can absolve the defendant of liability by demonstrating that their actions were aligned with acceptable standards of conduct. Essentially, it shifts the focus to whether the defendant's behavior was reasonable rather than whether harm occurred.
(3) some employers have successfully established a defense when reasonable care had been exercised to prevent and correct inappropriate use of technology to harass.
Reasonable care
The only reasonable defense would be a plea of "Self Defense"
The judge applied the reasonable person standard to determine if the defendant's actions were justified in self-defense.
extreme lack of attention to medical care
Self defense is a legal concept. It is an excuse in some instances. The rather vague measurement is if a reasonable person in that situation would have felt threatened. If the jury agrees that a reasonable person would have felt in danger, they can rule self defense.
Negligence
Convince enough members of a jury that they should have reasonable doubt about the facts of the case as the district attorney has presented them.
Duty of Care, i think
"Sound and reasonable" just means that he wasn't insane and couldn't use the insanity defense to escape being executed.
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
In this situation, the employee is considered and agent of the company and as such, it would be the company that is responsible, not the employee. If the employee accepts the package, they have to take what is known as "reasonable care" of the package in your absence. Reasonable care is defined as the degree of care in which any prudent person would use in a particular circumstance. In this case, reasonable care would include securing the package in a safe place such as behind the counter so that other customers would not have access. If the employee takes a break while in the care of your package, reasonable care would include the employee communicating to the person who is relieving them why they have the package and a description of the customer who left it in their care. Ultimately, if the employee took reasonable care measures adn the package was still stolen, the responsibility lies with you, the customer, not the employee or business.