The Supreme Court generally evaluates whether civil disobedience is constitutionally protected by considering the balance between free speech rights under the First Amendment and the government's interest in maintaining public order and enforcing laws. The Court typically looks at the nature of the act of civil disobedience, whether it involves nonviolent protest, and if it disrupts public peace or safety. If the act is deemed to be an expression of political speech rather than a violent disruption, it may receive protection; however, unlawful acts that result in significant harm or disruption often do not qualify for constitutional protection.
Federal
The Supreme Court has identified three types of speech: fully protected speech, which includes political or artistic expression and is protected by the First Amendment; partially protected speech, which includes commercial speech and is subject to certain restrictions; and unprotected speech, such as obscenity, defamation, and speech that incites violence, which is not protected by the First Amendment.
In addition to making Parliament supreme, the protected the rights of individuals?
swingvote
If there is a problem with the constitutionally of a law the Supreme Court makes the decision. The president has no power.
it acts as the final authority on the constitutionally of state and Federal Laws
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
exclusionary rule
1876