Koon v. United States, 518 US 81 (1996)
There were three other opinions issued (other than the majority opinion), all concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Justice Stevens wrote that he does not believe the District Court abused discretion. He accepts all parts of the majority opinion except that he does "not understand the opinion to foreclose the District Court from basing a downward departure on an aggregation of factors each of which might in itself be insufficient to justify a departure."
Justice Souter wrote, with which Justice Ginsburg joined, that he affirmed the Circuit Court's "rejection of the downward departures based on susceptibility to abuse in prison and on successive prosecution, for to do otherwise would be to attribute an element of irrationality to the Commission and to its 'heartland' concept."
Justice Breyer wrote, with which Justice Ginsburg joined, that the Guideline called into question encompasses the possibility of a "double prosecution." "For that reason, a simple double prosecution, without more, does not support a departure." Also, potential mistreatment in prison cannot be used for departure because then everybody would use that as an excuse.
You could just try this resource:Plessy v. FergusonPrimary source document outlining the Supreme Court's decision and a dissenting opinion. See the related link.
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The dissenting opinion in Roe v. Wade argued that the Constitution does not explicitly mention a right to abortion and that the decision should be left to individual states rather than decided at the federal level.
The decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was unanimous (9-0); there was no dissenting opinion. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court, and Justices Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, and William O. Douglas wrote concurring opinions.The case citation is Gideon v. Wainwright,372 US 335 (1963)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
There was no dissenting opinion. The decision in McCulloch was formed unanimously, by a vote of 7-0. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the only opinion in the case.Chief JusticeJohn MarshallAssociate JusticesBushrod WashingtonWilliam JohnsonHenry Brockholst LivingstonThomas ToddGabriel DuvallJoseph StoryCase Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the majority opinion, and Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the dissenting opinion.For more information, see Related Questions below.
maxwell got ten years in prison for not giving sheppard a fair trial
In the case of Kennedy v. Bremerton, the dissenting opinion was that the school district did not violate the First Amendment rights of the football coach by prohibiting his public prayers on the field. The key arguments presented in the dissenting opinion were that the coach's actions could be seen as an endorsement of religion by the school, and that allowing public prayers at school events could make students of different faiths feel excluded or pressured to participate.
In Plessy v. Ferguson, the dissenting opinion argued that the "separate but equal" doctrine sanctioned by the majority perpetuated inequality and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The dissent maintained that segregation based on race was inherently discriminatory and could not be justified under the Constitution.
Precedent