What was the concurring opinion on Sheppard v Maxwell?

What amendments were challenged in Sheppard v Maxwell?

3

Who were the concurring and dissenting justices for Morse v Frederick?

You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part

What is the concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia?

In the case of Loving v. Virginia, the concurring opinion was written by Justice Potter Stewart. He agreed with the majority's ruling that Virginia's anti-miscegenation law was unconstitutional but wrote a separate concurrence to emphasize that the freedom to marry was a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. He argued that the Constitution prohibits interracial marriage restrictions just as it forbids measures that discriminate based on race.

What is the historical importance of the sheppard v maxwell case?

it set the standard for gag orders, designed to prevent pre-judicial trial publicity

What was the long term effects of the desicion in Sheppard v Maxwell?

The long term effects of the decision in Sheppard v Maxwell include establishing the right to a fair trial in high-profile cases and emphasizing the importance of preventing media bias that could influence jurors. This case also highlighted the role of the judiciary in ensuring defendants receive a fair and impartial trial.

Who wrote the dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden?

There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Who wrote the majority opinion for Reynolds v US?

Chief Justice Morrison Waite wrote the unanimous opinion of the Court for Reynolds v. US, (1878). Justice Stephen J. Field wrote a concurring opinion.Case Citation:Reynolds v. United States, 98 US 145 (1878)For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Who wrote the opinion of the Court for Lawrence v. Texas?

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003)Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court, and was joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, and Breyer. Justice O'Connor voted with the majority, but wrote a separate concurring opinion rather than signing Kennedy's.Chief Justice Rehnquist, and Justices Scalia and Thomas dissented.

What was the dissenting opinion in Gideon v. Wainwright?

The decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was unanimous (9-0); there was no dissenting opinion. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court, and Justices Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, and William O. Douglas wrote concurring opinions.The case citation is Gideon v. Wainwright,372 US 335 (1963)For more information, see Related Questions, below.

What is the concurring and dissenting opinion in bolling v sharpe?

In Bolling v. Sharpe (1954), the Supreme Court addressed racial segregation in public schools in Washington, D.C. The concurring opinion, authored by Justice William O. Douglas, emphasized the principles of equality under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, arguing that segregation violated fundamental rights. The dissenting opinion, led by Justice Felix Frankfurter, expressed concern about judicial overreach and the potential consequences of the decision on federal powers. Ultimately, the Court ruled that segregation in D.C. schools was unconstitutional, aligning it with the broader civil rights movement.

Which supreme court justice said of the obscenity you know it when you see it?

Potter Stewart, in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.

What type of opinion is written to make a point that was not made in the opinion of the Court?

A Justice may write a concurring opinion, which sometimes says "concurring in judgment only," if he or she votes with the majority but either disagrees with the logic used to arrive at the decision; agrees with part of the decision, but disagrees with another part; or wants to address relevant points not made in the majority opinion. When there is a clear majority opinion joined by a substantial number of Justices, concurring opinions can help strengthen a case and may be cited as precedent in future cases.Sometimes the court issues so many separate opinions that whichever opinion is joined by the most justices is referred to as a plurality, rather than a majority. One recent example of a decision holding a plurality opinion is that of Baez et al., v. Rees (2008), where Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy and Alito signed one opinion, and Justice Stevens wrote a separate concurring opinion, as did Justices Scalia, Breyer, and Thomas (Scalia also joined Thomas' concurrence). Justice Ginsberg wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justice Souter joined.There are also a number of cases where members of the majority each wrote a concurring opinion, without creating a unified majority or plurality opinion, as well as cases where the court decision was released without the signature of any justice, in an anonymous fashion. This latter form is known as a per curiamdecision. Bush v. Gore (2000) is a recent example. Cases decided per curiam do not create a precedent that can be cited in future litigation.Plurality and per curiam decisions tend to create confusion as to how a federal or constitutional law is to be interpreted.