0
What else can I help you with?
What amendments were challenged in Sheppard v Maxwell?
3
Who were the concurring and dissenting justices for Morse v Frederick?
You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part
What is the concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia?
In the case of Loving v. Virginia, the concurring opinion was written by Justice Potter Stewart. He agreed with the majority's ruling that Virginia's anti-miscegenation law was unconstitutional but wrote a separate concurrence to emphasize that the freedom to marry was a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. He argued that the Constitution prohibits interracial marriage restrictions just as it forbids measures that discriminate based on race.
What is the historical importance of the sheppard v maxwell case?
it set the standard for gag orders, designed to prevent pre-judicial trial publicity
What was the long term effects of the desicion in Sheppard v Maxwell?
The long term effects of the decision in Sheppard v Maxwell include establishing the right to a fair trial in high-profile cases and emphasizing the importance of preventing media bias that could influence jurors. This case also highlighted the role of the judiciary in ensuring defendants receive a fair and impartial trial.
What was the concurring opinion in roe v wade?
In Roe v. Wade, the concurring opinion, primarily authored by Justice Potter Stewart, agreed with the majority that the right to privacy encompassed a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. Stewart emphasized the importance of individual liberty and the need for the government to avoid unnecessary intrusion into personal choices. He supported the framework established by the majority opinion, which balanced a woman's right to choose against the state's interests in regulating abortions. The concurring opinion reinforced the notion that the decision should ultimately rest with the individual rather than the state.
Who wrote the dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden?
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who wrote the majority opinion for Reynolds v US?
Chief Justice Morrison Waite wrote the unanimous opinion of the Court for Reynolds v. US, (1878). Justice Stephen J. Field wrote a concurring opinion.Case Citation:Reynolds v. United States, 98 US 145 (1878)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who wrote the opinion of the Court for Lawrence v. Texas?
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003)Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court, and was joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, and Breyer. Justice O'Connor voted with the majority, but wrote a separate concurring opinion rather than signing Kennedy's.Chief Justice Rehnquist, and Justices Scalia and Thomas dissented.
What was the dissenting opinion in Gideon v. Wainwright?
The decision in Gideon v. Wainwright was unanimous (9-0); there was no dissenting opinion. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court, and Justices Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, and William O. Douglas wrote concurring opinions.The case citation is Gideon v. Wainwright,372 US 335 (1963)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is the concurring and dissenting opinion in bolling v sharpe?
In Bolling v. Sharpe (1954), the Supreme Court addressed racial segregation in public schools in Washington, D.C. The concurring opinion, authored by Justice William O. Douglas, emphasized the principles of equality under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, arguing that segregation violated fundamental rights. The dissenting opinion, led by Justice Felix Frankfurter, expressed concern about judicial overreach and the potential consequences of the decision on federal powers. Ultimately, the Court ruled that segregation in D.C. schools was unconstitutional, aligning it with the broader civil rights movement.
Which supreme court justice said of the obscenity you know it when you see it?
Potter Stewart, in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184 (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
