answersLogoWhite

0

There is no concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia. The court opinion was unanimous.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who were the concurring and dissenting justices for Morse v Frederick?

You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part


Name of the case of 1967 that enabled interracial marriage?

The Loving Decision (Loving v Virginia).


What was the concurring opinion in roe v wade?

In Roe v. Wade, the concurring opinion, primarily authored by Justice Potter Stewart, agreed with the majority that the right to privacy encompassed a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. Stewart emphasized the importance of individual liberty and the need for the government to avoid unnecessary intrusion into personal choices. He supported the framework established by the majority opinion, which balanced a woman's right to choose against the state's interests in regulating abortions. The concurring opinion reinforced the notion that the decision should ultimately rest with the individual rather than the state.


When did the Court decide In Loving v Virginia?

in June 12, 1967


What type of law is the case Loving v Virginia case based upon statute law amendment or administrative law?

Loving v. Virginia is a Supreme Court case that found the Virginia statute prohibiting interracial marriages to be unconstitutional.


Which court case declared struck down miscegenation laws?

Loving v. Virginia


What did the miscegenation laws make illegal?

Interracial marriages. The US Supreme Court declared these laws unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. *The opinion comments previously here have been moved to the discussion section.


What is the historical context surrounding the Loving v Virginia case?

In the state of Virginia it was illegal for people of different races to marry. Loving and Virginia married even though they were an interracial couple. They faced many legal and social problems in Virginia because of this.


What was the effect of the supreme courts decision in loving v Virginia?

What was the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia


What was the concurring opinion on Sheppard v Maxwell?

maxwell got ten years in prison for not giving sheppard a fair trial


What was loving v Virginia full case name?

The full case name of Loving v. Virginia is "Richard Perry Loving and Mildred Jeter Loving v. Virginia." The case was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1967 and addressed the constitutionality of laws banning interracial marriage. The Court ruled that such laws violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision effectively invalidated state laws prohibiting interracial marriage across the United States.


Who wrote the dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden?

There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.