The Hoover-Stimson Doctrine, articulated in 1932, stated that the United States would not recognize territorial changes resulting from aggressive actions, specifically in reference to Japan's invasion of Manchuria. This policy aimed to uphold international law and promote peace, but ultimately had limited effectiveness, as it did not lead to any concrete actions or sanctions against Japan. It reflected the U.S. commitment to non-recognition of territorial conquests but also underscored the limitations of diplomatic measures in the face of military aggression. Consequently, the doctrine is often seen as a symbolic stance rather than a successful foreign policy initiative.
St Thomas Aqinas Devised the doctrine of Double effect
he was not following the terms
Contributory negligence
Monroe Doctrine stopped Europe from colonizing land from America.
He eliminated the fairness doctrine
Defense Department Doctrine shifted from all-out conventional warfare to a Policy of Containment.
There is no such doctrine. Perhaps you're looking for the Monroe Doctrine.
The Monroe Doctrine was in direct opposition to the Truman Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine said the US should not interfere with events in Europe.
Answer with the question: Is it the Brezhnev Doctrine just made over? Or no Doctrine?
Apostolic Doctrine.
His doctrine of popular sovereignty has affect on the French. His ideas also have the effect on socialists thoughts.
a doctrine of containment :p