In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights, specifically the Fifth Amendment's protection against the taking of private property without just compensation, did not apply to state governments. The case centered on John Barron's claim that the city of Baltimore's actions had harmed his wharf business without compensation. The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, held that the protections of the Bill of Rights were intended only to limit the federal government and did not extend to state actions. This ruling established a significant precedent regarding the application of constitutional rights at the state level.
majority opinion
the ruling of state supreme courts are always the final judgment on a matter.
what is the supreme courts ruling in the case Plessy vs ferguson
what is the supreme courts ruling in the case Plessy vs ferguson
In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. The case involved John Barron, who claimed that the city of Baltimore had violated his property rights by dumping sand in the harbor, rendering his wharf unusable. The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, concluded that the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of just compensation for property taken by the government was applicable only to the federal government, not to the states. This decision established a precedent for the interpretation of federalism and the limits of federal power over state actions.
Dissent
Dissent
Dissent
Dissent
A United States Supreme Court decision is mandatory on all lower federal courts. That includes federal courts of appeal and federal district courts.
Supreme courts have full national jurisdiction, respecting the sovereignty of other nations in the process of ruling.
It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections.