The Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, issued in 1973, addressed the constitutionality of laws that criminalized or restricted access to abortions. The Court ruled that a woman's right to choose to have an abortion fell under the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision effectively legalized abortion across the United States, striking down many state laws that limited access to the procedure. Roe v. Wade has since been a pivotal and contentious issue in American legal and political discourse.
Abortion.
To provide an accurate response, I would need more specific information about which Supreme Court decision you are referring to, as the Court has issued many significant rulings over the years. Each decision typically addresses specific legal questions and outlines the Court's reasoning and conclusions. If you specify the case or topic, I can summarize it effectively.
http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-v-lopez
No. According to Article VI, the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land" which justices of the US Supreme Court swear to uphold. The Constitution is the standard by which other legislation is judged; the Constitution itself is not subject to judicial review.For more information on this topic, see Related Questions, below.
The Founding Fathers would likely have differing opinions on the topic. Jefferson, for instance, would feel the Supreme Court is abusing its power; he even felt judicial review overstepped Constitutional limits. Others, however, such as Hamilton and Madison, were (and would probably be) more open to the decisions the Supreme Court has made.
Both Congress and the President have the ability to check the power of the Supreme Court, but Congress exerts more influence than the President:Legislative branch checks on Supreme CourtSenate approves federal judges, including Supreme Court justices (Advise and Consent Clause)Impeachment power (House)Trial of impeachments (Senate)Power to initiate constitutional amendments (to undo supreme court decisions)Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme CourtPower to set jurisdiction of courts (they can tell a court that they can not hear a case on a certain topic, which includes changing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court)Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court (if the size is drastically increased the President may select all the new justices and change the sway of power)Executive branch checks on Supreme CourtNominates justices to the Supreme CourtPower of pardon (except impeached officials)(Informal power to neglect enforcement of Supreme Court decisions. This is not supposed to occur in theory, but has happened a number of times in fact.)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
DIVERGENT VIEWSAnswerYes. A Supreme Court Justice is placed in office for life and no one can hold them accountable for the decisions they make. We have term limitations in the Executive Branch. Legislative branch members must be re-elected but the Supreme Court Judges are there for life.AnswerWhether the Supreme Court is too powerful is always been a hot topic. However, take into consideration that the Court's job is to first and foremost interpret the constitution. If, as the person above suggests, we elect Justices, the interpretation of the constitution would become too political. The founders wanted to safeguard the Constitution and put in Justices for life terms.Furthermore, the Supreme Court really only has power to the extent that the other 2 branches of government abide by its rulings. After all, the Supreme Court doesn't have an army or police force with which it can enforce its rulings. Of course, if Congress or the executive branch decided to flout a Supreme Court ruling, they would basically be saying that the constitution has become irrelevant, and then we'd have far bigger problems than an academic debate over the extent of the Supreme Court's power.AnswerNo.It does the job it is set up to do, and that job only. The only way you could possibly decrease the power it has is by creating a further court above it. But the same thing happens: a higher court will always have more power than the lower court, so you could only shift the power to a different place, never take it away.Moreover, that would lower the impact of justice, since someone could always appeal the decision regardless of how many courts had agreed on the verdict.
For the most part the Lincoln and Douglas debates centered around slavery. Lincoln made it clear how strong his opposition to slavery was. Douglas was not a pro-slavery advocate, but trusted the US Supreme Court decision in 1858 that basically declared slavery legal.
That, as such a broad topic, has not yet been fully decided by the US Supreme Court but individual cases have tested some areas and more are being considered every day.
The website listed in related links contains all the local rules for Indiana courts, including the Indiana Supreme Court. If the particular topic you're inquiring about isn't addressed, follow the appropriate federal guidelines. For more information, see Related Link, below.
Tick box
Irony.