The answer to this question is "none of the above." Cutting and pasting a multiple-choice question with no choices does not help anyone. If you want a meaningful answer, put some thought and effort into your question. If you are trying to get answers here to help you get promoted, instead of doing your own research, you are not ready for a higher rank yet.
The four types of command relationships used by Army commanders when task organizing are Combatant Command (COCOM), Operational Control (OPCON), Tactical Control (TACON), and Support.
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
OPCON SSD answer
The four types of command relationships army commanders use are:Administrative control (ADCON)Operational control (OPCON)Tactical control (TACON)Combatant command (COCOM)
When task organizing, commanders typically use a functional command relationship known as "support," where subordinate units are given specific tasks and responsibilities to achieve a common objective. This relationship allows for flexibility and adaptability, enabling units to leverage their capabilities effectively. Commanders may also employ direct or coordinating relationships to ensure clear lines of authority and communication among units. Ultimately, the chosen command relationship facilitates efficient execution of missions while maintaining operational unity.
One of the four types of command relationships is "Operational Control" (OPCON). This type of command relationship allows a commander to exercise authority over subordinate forces for the purpose of organizing and employing them while retaining responsibility for their administration and support. Other command relationships include "Administrative Control" (ADCON), "Tactical Control" (TACON), and "Support." Each type defines the degree of authority and responsibility between commanders.