The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Court ruled that state laws requiring racial segregation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, asserting that as long as the separate facilities for the races were equal, segregation was permissible. This decision reflected the prevailing racial attitudes of the time and effectively legitimized discriminatory practices across the United States for decades.
Segregation
The Plessy v. Ferguson case was indeed heard in lower courts before reaching the Supreme Court. Initially, Homer Plessy was arrested for violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act, leading to a trial in a local court, where he was found guilty. His case was subsequently appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court's decision, leading Plessy to challenge the ruling at the federal level. Ultimately, the Supreme Court's 1896 decision established the "separate but equal" doctrine, legitimizing racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson.
The US Supreme Court.
Separate but equal
Plessy v. Ferguson.
The brown decision contradicted the plessy decision, holding that separate but equal treatment was not really equal
The Brown decision contradicted the plessy decision, holding that separate but equal treatment was not really equal
Type your answer here... Plessy v. Ferguson.
Plessy V Ferguson (1896)
In the Plessy decision, the Supreme Court ruled that such segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896)The "separate but equal" doctrine derived from the decision in the US Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), delivered on May 18, 1896.The Plessy decision was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)