answersLogoWhite

0

Its not. It was a restraint decision.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What Presidential right is involved in US v. Nixon?

United States v. Nixon, 347 US 683 (1974)On 24 July 1974, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Nixon, that Executive Privilege did NOT apply in a criminal matter, unless the protected information involved military or diplomatic secrets, or national security. This decision is what led to Nixon's resignation on 9 August 1974.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was the outcome us v. Nixon?

The outcome of United States v. Nixon was a unanimous 8-0 decision by the Supreme Court, ruling that President Nixon must turn over tape recordings and other materials subpoenaed as evidence in the Watergate scandal. This decision established the principle that the President is not immune from the judicial process and must comply with court orders. As a result, Nixon resigned from the presidency shortly after the ruling.


What was the majority opinion in the trial of the US v. Nixon?

In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that President Nixon did not have absolute executive privilege, particularly in relation to the Watergate scandal. The Court emphasized that the need for evidence in a criminal trial outweighed the president's claims of confidentiality. This decision ultimately led to Nixon's release of the tapes and was pivotal in affirming the principle that no one, not even the president, is above the law.


Was there any significant information missing from us v Nixon?

this dick


Who wrote the majority decision in Nixon v US?

United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote the opinion of a unanimous (8-0) Court. Justice William Rehnquist recused himself because of his close ties to the Nixon administration.[Note: The question originally asked about Nixon v. United States, a case involving appeal of impeachment of a Mississippi federal District Court judge, in 1993. See Related Questions for information about that case.]For more information about United States v. Nixon, see Related Questions, below.


Who were the main parties involved in the US v Nixon case?

The main parties involved in the US v. Nixon case were President Richard Nixon and the United States government, represented by the special prosecutor and other officials. The case arose from the Watergate scandal, leading to Nixon's refusal to release audio tapes related to the investigation. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the President was not above the law, requiring him to turn over the tapes. This decision was pivotal in upholding the principle of accountability in the executive branch.


What are some real world examples of rule of law?

US v. Nixon


President before Nixon named starting with an E?

The US President who served before Nixon starting with an "E" was Dwight D. Eisenhower. Nixon was his V-P.


What was the result of the Supreme Court case US v Nixon?

presidential powers were limited


Who won in the us v Nixon case?

idk wut happened but i hope that someone answers me because this is for a project


Who was president when roe v wade was passed?

The President in office at the time the US Supreme Court made abortion legal in Roe v. Wade, (1973), was Richard Nixon. President Nixon had nothing to do with the decision, so it's unreasonable to suggest that he "made abortion legal." There was nothing he could do to prevent the decision.Nixon was in office from 1968 until his resignation in 1974.


Which principle of the Constitution did that Supreme Court decision on the US vs Nixon reaffirm?

The Supreme Court decision in United States v. Nixon reaffirmed the principle of the rule of law, emphasizing that no person, not even the President, is above the law. The Court ruled that President Nixon had to comply with a subpoena to release tape recordings and documents related to the Watergate scandal, establishing that executive privilege does not grant absolute immunity from judicial oversight. This decision underscored the concept of checks and balances within the government, ensuring accountability and transparency.