Were deserters from the Royal Navy.
by arguing that some people were created to rule others.
The Confederate states justified secession primarily by invoking the principle of states' rights, arguing that the U.S. Constitution allowed states to withdraw from the Union if they believed their rights were being violated. They claimed that the federal government was overstepping its authority, particularly regarding the issue of slavery, which they viewed as essential to their economy and way of life. Additionally, they emphasized the right to self-determination and the belief that they were preserving their sovereignty against what they perceived as Northern aggression.
The southerners placed themselves in opposition to much of the rest of the Western world
Southerners often justified the theory of states' rights and the institution of slavery by arguing that the Constitution allowed states to govern themselves and make their own laws. They claimed that slavery was a necessary economic system that benefited the Southern economy and society. Additionally, many used pseudoscientific theories and cultural arguments to assert that African Americans were inferior and that slavery was a benevolent institution. This justification was deeply rooted in a desire to preserve their way of life and economic interests during the antebellum period.
Southerners justified slavery by promoting the belief in racial superiority, arguing that African Americans were inherently inferior and suited for servitude. They claimed that slavery was a benevolent institution that provided care and civilization to enslaved people, framing it as a moral obligation. This justification was often supported by pseudoscientific theories and selective interpretations of religious texts, which portrayed slavery as a natural and necessary social order. Such beliefs were deeply entrenched in Southern society and were used to rationalize the economic benefits of slavery.
Democratic Republic
In "Common Sense," Thomas Paine refers to Great Britain as the island in question. He discusses the relationship between the American colonies and Britain, arguing for independence and criticizing the monarchy's rule. Paine emphasizes the geographic and political separation between the colonies and Britain to advocate for self-governance and the establishment of an independent nation.
In 1767, John Dickinson, a Philadelphia lawyer, strongly opposed Great Britain's imposition of taxes on the American colonies, arguing that such actions violated their rights as Englishmen. He believed that taxation without representation was unjust, as the colonies had no voice in the British Parliament. Dickinson's objections highlighted the growing tension between the colonies and Britain, as he advocated for the rights and autonomy of the American people. His stance was pivotal in shaping colonial resistance to British taxation policies.
A historian makes a speech arguing that Great Britain had history’s great empire.
Beveridge justified American acquisition of new territories by arguing that it was a moral and strategic imperative for the United States to expand its influence and promote democracy and civilization. He believed that the U.S. had a responsibility to uplift and civilize "lesser" nations through American ideals. Additionally, Beveridge emphasized the economic benefits of expansion, claiming that new territories would provide markets for American goods and opportunities for American enterprise. This perspective reflected a broader belief in Manifest Destiny and American exceptionalism during that era.
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
By arguing that King George III had violated the agreement between England and its colonies
Supporters of social Darwinism justified expansion of American powers overseas by arguing that it was the natural progression of a superior civilization to dominate and "civilize" less developed societies. They believed that spreading American influence would help those societies advance and bring progress to the world, in line with the principles of survival of the fittest.
They are always arguing. We were arguing over where to go for dinner.
In criminal court you have two sides advocating for their particular party. The prosecutor arguing for the state, and the defense arguing for the defendant. They are adversaries. Thus, an adversarial system, not a cooperative system.
Europeans justified slavery by arguing that it was economically necessary for their overseas colonies, as well as morally acceptable due to the belief in the superiority of European culture and religion. It was also seen as a way to civilize and Christianize indigenous populations.