The cotton gin was able to quickly separate the fibers of the cotton from their seeds. This meant thread, fabric, and clothing could all be produced faster than ever before. In turn, the demand for cotton and cotton products increased. This meant more cotton needed to be grown and more slaves were needed to tend to the cotton.
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
Cotton production could not have been done profitably without slavery.
Free states and slave states both wanted to see their ideas extend to the west. Americans who moved west took their different ways of life with them. This was a conflict for Missouri because they believed in slavery.
Simple. Once the cotton gin was invented workers were needed to work on the plantations. Therefore, slavery happened.
He would have immediately caused poor relations between himself and states that approved slavery, but remained part of the union. States such as Maryland, who were pro-slavery, would have left the union, as well. The Civil War was fought over the expansion of slavery, not the essence of slavery itself.
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
the expansion of slavery ! @tjoness <---- follow that guy
It added southern states.
Cotton production could not have been done profitably without slavery.
There is no slavery today therefore there is no present relationship with the past.
If the lands north of Missouri were closed to slavery, pro-slavery and pro-expansion advocates might turn their focus to the lands west of Missouri, such as the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, as potential areas for further expansion of slavery. This could lead to increased tensions and conflicts over the expansion of slavery into these western territories.
Eli Whitney was responsible for the expansion of slavery in America during the 1800's.
The relationship, was that slaves were needed to harvest the crops, so the plantation owner could get his profit from them.
The Republicans.
First of all their was not a relationship.... it was an institution. The feeling about this institution was both mixed and accepted. It probably was accepted because the Christian world did not speak out openly against it. And during this period of our American history, it was not clearly understood about the negative aspects, that was to come out of slavery. Slavery and the issues that it brought up were huge....... When something is institutionalized, it becomes a part of you. And slavery became a large part of the American foundation from the South to the North.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 addressed the issue of slavery and its expansion into newly acquired territories. It established a line, known as the 36°30' parallel, where slavery would be prohibited in the northern territories of the Louisiana Purchase, excluding Missouri. This compromise attempted to maintain a balance of power between slave and free states while addressing increasing tensions between the North and South. However, it only temporarily delayed the eventual conflict over the expansion of slavery in the West.
It effected slavery's westward expansion because slavery would'nt be loyal in any territoy North.