The cotton gin was able to quickly separate the fibers of the cotton from their seeds. This meant thread, fabric, and clothing could all be produced faster than ever before. In turn, the demand for cotton and cotton products increased. This meant more cotton needed to be grown and more slaves were needed to tend to the cotton.
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
The conflict between northern and southern states in the U.S. primarily centered on issues of slavery, states' rights, and economic differences. The North, which was more industrialized and favored free labor, sought to limit the expansion of slavery into new territories. In contrast, the South's economy relied heavily on agriculture and enslaved labor, leading them to advocate for the preservation and expansion of slavery. This tension ultimately culminated in the Civil War, as both regions struggled over the moral and political implications of slavery and federal authority.
Cotton production could not have been done profitably without slavery.
Free states and slave states both wanted to see their ideas extend to the west. Americans who moved west took their different ways of life with them. This was a conflict for Missouri because they believed in slavery.
Simple. Once the cotton gin was invented workers were needed to work on the plantations. Therefore, slavery happened.
The issue of expansion of slavery was its expansion and growth into Western territories.
the expansion of slavery ! @tjoness <---- follow that guy
The conflict between northern and southern states in the U.S. primarily centered on issues of slavery, states' rights, and economic differences. The North, which was more industrialized and favored free labor, sought to limit the expansion of slavery into new territories. In contrast, the South's economy relied heavily on agriculture and enslaved labor, leading them to advocate for the preservation and expansion of slavery. This tension ultimately culminated in the Civil War, as both regions struggled over the moral and political implications of slavery and federal authority.
It added southern states.
Cotton production could not have been done profitably without slavery.
There is no slavery today therefore there is no present relationship with the past.
The relationship, was that slaves were needed to harvest the crops, so the plantation owner could get his profit from them.
If the lands north of Missouri were closed to slavery, pro-slavery and pro-expansion advocates might turn their focus to the lands west of Missouri, such as the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, as potential areas for further expansion of slavery. This could lead to increased tensions and conflicts over the expansion of slavery into these western territories.
Eli Whitney was responsible for the expansion of slavery in America during the 1800's.
First of all their was not a relationship.... it was an institution. The feeling about this institution was both mixed and accepted. It probably was accepted because the Christian world did not speak out openly against it. And during this period of our American history, it was not clearly understood about the negative aspects, that was to come out of slavery. Slavery and the issues that it brought up were huge....... When something is institutionalized, it becomes a part of you. And slavery became a large part of the American foundation from the South to the North.
The Republicans.
Simple. Once the cotton gin was invented workers were needed to work on the plantations. Therefore, slavery happened.