It claimed that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, if the Constitution was interpreted in a certain way.
This delighted the South, as much as it angered Northern Abolitionists, and raised the temperature of the whole slavery debate nationwide.
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
Slave owners largely welcomed the Dred Scott decision, viewing it as a validation of their rights and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery. The Supreme Court's ruling, which stated that African Americans could not be considered citizens and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, galvanized pro-slavery sentiments and emboldened slaveholders. Many saw it as a victory that justified the expansion of slavery into new territories, further entrenching their economic and social power. However, it also intensified the national debate over slavery, contributing to rising tensions leading up to the Civil War.
The Missouri Compromise temporarily settled the debate over slavery by allowing Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. Maine was allowed to enter the Union as a free state.
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
A decision on slavery and a debate on states rights versus federal rights.
the dred scott case was a major turning point in the debate of slavery. this case made it known that slavery was protected under the constiton. slaves were considered property and in the bill of rights, property could not be taken away without a warrant. the dred scott cause let all americans know that the law staed that slaves were not humans, not citizens, did not have rights, and were property. in my opinion, this is when he debate on slavery became so serious in not be fixed with another comprimise.
the dred scott case was a major turning point in the debate of slavery. this case made it known that slavery was protected under the constiton. slaves were considered property and in the bill of rights, property could not be taken away without a warrant. the dred scott cause let all americans know that the law staed that slaves were not humans, not citizens, did not have rights, and were property. in my opinion, this is when he debate on slavery became so serious in not be fixed with another comprimise.
The Dred Scott decision ruled that slaves were not citizens of the United states. Instead, they were the property of their masters. Therefore, a slave owner was within his rights to take a slave with him, even to free states.
It led church members to become more active in government
Because it turned the slavery debate into an actual shooting war that lasted four years.
Stephen A. Douglas
William Wilberforce
Slavery
For the most part, the national debate on slavery was not whether to abolish it. Most Americans, especially in the North, did not want slavery to spread to the western frontiers.
It raised the debate to a new pitch when the Supreme Court declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution. This apparently meant that the new territories would not be able to vote to enter the Union as free soil. It delighted the South but horrified the North, especially the Abolitionists who were gaining influence in Congress. And it drowned out the moderate voices. It was a big step towards war.