The First Nation's People of Canada felt that no individual owned the land and that humans were all an equally of part of it. Although they demonstrated territorial claims, this was due to the fact that they felt that their ancestral spirits dwelled in these parts.
Conversely, the European view was that land could be owned, bought and sold.
Because, the land was first the Native American's , and the European Settler's were going to take the land away from them.
The colonists were taking and clearing land that was the Native American's hunting grounds. At first the Native Americans were peaceful and made treaties with the colonists, but after the colonists just kept expanding, the Native Americans knew that had to fight for their land.
A painting depicting native American land.
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
A Native American's description of the mission might emphasize the disruption of their traditional way of life, highlighting the loss of land, autonomy, and cultural practices due to European encroachment. In contrast, Azara and the European perspective might portray the mission as a benevolent effort to "civilize" and convert Indigenous peoples, framing it as a positive force for education and development. This difference reflects a fundamental clash of values, where Native Americans view the mission as a source of colonization and oppression, while Europeans see it as a noble endeavor.
Because, the land was first the Native American's , and the European Settler's were going to take the land away from them.
Because they wanted to steal land.
The colonists were taking and clearing land that was the Native American's hunting grounds. At first the Native Americans were peaceful and made treaties with the colonists, but after the colonists just kept expanding, the Native Americans knew that had to fight for their land.
Europeans were all about it and wanted to colonize the the lands they "discovered." The Natives hated it; it was the land they were one first, not to mention it was all an open expanse of forest and plains. The Europeans ruined that for the Natives.
European lands claim to Native Americans by battleing their fears
A painting depicting native American land.
How were your European and native American cultures blended in new Spain
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
A Native American's description of the mission might emphasize the disruption of their traditional way of life, highlighting the loss of land, autonomy, and cultural practices due to European encroachment. In contrast, Azara and the European perspective might portray the mission as a benevolent effort to "civilize" and convert Indigenous peoples, framing it as a positive force for education and development. This difference reflects a fundamental clash of values, where Native Americans view the mission as a source of colonization and oppression, while Europeans see it as a noble endeavor.
When European settlers came to America, there was no Native American 'literature' as we know literature today. There were only oral histories, traditions and elders. Since the Native People's languages and the European people's languages were different, there was no ability to share 'literature' of any kind. Realize, too, that European settlers viewed the Americas as a 'free and open landscape' where they could settle and claim their new lives, regardless of what they found on the land, including Native American peoples.
some native american's still have land
concept of land