0
What else can I help you with?
What kind of argument is made in a claim of value?
An argument that debates whether or not something is right or wrong
What was Calhoun's argument?
i have no idea
What argument do critics of affirmative action often make?
Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
Controversial - what does it mean?
A lot of disagreement or argument about something
What issue triggered the argument over nullification?
nullification crisis
What is impartiality in civil courts?
'Impartial' means; maintaining complete neutrality - without any pre-judged thoughts - completely open to argument - non-judgemental.
What are the two ways that a moral argument can fail?
A moral argument can fail if it contains logical fallacies or if it is based on false premises. Additionally, the argument may also fail if it lacks clear reasoning or uses faulty moral principles.
What was the argument against Franklin Delano Roosevelt's court-packing plan?
The argument against Roosevelt's court-packing plan was that it was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers and would have given the Executive Branch control over the Judicial Branch, thus ending their independence as a separate branch of government.
First person to critique using a philosophical approach?
Criticism from a philosophical perspective could involve questioning the underlying assumptions and principles of the argument, examining the logic and validity of the reasoning, and evaluating the coherence of the argument in relation to ethical or metaphysical principles. This critique would likely delve deeply into the foundations of the argument and aim to uncover any potential contradictions or fallacies in its premises or implications.
What is uncogent argument in logic?
An uncogent argument in logic is one that fails to provide valid or sound reasoning to support its conclusion. This can be due to logical fallacies, false premises, or weak evidence. In essence, it is an argument that does not effectively convince or persuade based on logical principles.
What is the passage argument for appellees an example of?
The passage argument for appellees is an example of a legal argument presented by the party appealing a lower court's decision, wherein they outline their position and reasoning for why the lower court's decision should be upheld. This argument typically includes citations to relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to support their position.
How does logic help to form a good argument?
Logic helps to form a good argument by providing a structured framework for reasoning, ensuring that conclusions are drawn based on sound principles. It allows individuals to assess the validity of their claims and the strength of their evidence, facilitating clear communication. By employing logical principles, one can identify fallacies and strengthen the coherence and persuasiveness of their argument. Ultimately, logic enhances critical thinking, making arguments more convincing and robust.
How do you write heads of argument?
When writing heads of argument, you should outline the main points you will be presenting to support your case. Start by clearly stating your position and then present each argument in a logical and organized manner, supporting them with evidence and legal principles. Make sure to address each key issue in a persuasive and concise way.
Why is this passage effective in supporting Roosevelt's argument?
This passage effectively supports Roosevelt's argument by providing specific examples and statistical evidence to demonstrate the need for government intervention in regulating big business. It highlights the negative impact of monopolies and trusts on competition and emphasizes the importance of protecting consumers and small businesses from unfair practices. The language used is persuasive and appeals to the reader's sense of justice and fairness.
For china describe one argument for and one argument against the privatization of industry?
In general terms, one argument for the privatization of industry in contemporary China is that it will bring dramatically increased economic profits to certain sectors of the national economy. One argument against such privatization: it will challenge the socialistic vision by which the country was re-founded in 1949 in such a way as to require a difficult re-formulation of the country's guiding principles.
Which detail is essential to Churchill's argument that countries should not remain neutral in the war?
An essential detail in Churchill's argument against neutrality during the war is the notion that standing by while aggressors invade and threaten the stability of nations ultimately endangers all countries. He emphasizes that neutrality can lead to moral complicity and that the consequences of inaction can be far more detrimental than the risks associated with taking a stand. By framing the conflict as a battle between good and evil, Churchill asserts that countries have a responsibility to defend freedom and democracy, rather than allowing tyranny to thrive unchecked.
What presents a faulty eitheror argument?
A faulty either-or argument, also known as a false dilemma or false dichotomy, occurs when an argument presents only two options while ignoring other viable alternatives. This type of reasoning oversimplifies complex issues, leading to misleading conclusions. For example, stating that "you are either with us or against us" disregards the possibility of neutrality or differing perspectives. Such arguments can manipulate public opinion by forcing a choice between extremes.
