the north
Yes, it is true that the South had an advantage in terms of its extensive railroad network. Railroads played a crucial role in transporting goods, troops, and supplies during the American Civil War. Additionally, the South's independent states allowed for greater state autonomy, which contributed to their ability to mobilize resources and maintain control over their territory.
The North had 34,022 kilometres of railroads The South had 14,141 " " " The Border States had 3,020 kilometres of railroads .
Well first of all, the South was pratically destroyed after the Civil War, so they had reconsruction of the south which ended up at about 12 years...
1,ooo miles
Southern railroads were a link among the Confederate states that transported troops and supplies. Wherever Union forces were able to take a foothold or conduct a raid, they destroyed railroads as much as possible. Some rail links were however not destroyed. In cases such as these it was because the Union were able to use the rail links for their own supplies and troop movements.
yes they helped with the trading.
Around 19,000
the north
No, the Union had a far greater railroad network, and ended up often having to rebuild captured railroads in the South.
Immigrants settled in the south because of low investment in railroads. This happen during and after the Civil War.
the construction of railroads (from studyisland)
No - most of the SOUTH was
because they lost and their stuff was destroyed
The trains IMPROVEMENT Railroads, wagons, carts, blockade-runners.
In the south
farming had been destroyed