Both were racial encounters. Plus both were indirect of the lower class vs. the ruling class
just cause
Lincoln and Douglas agreed on a few points, one of which was on the question of Utah, that if Utah was in open rebellion (it was. about mormonism) then they should have to submit to the will of the federal government and its policies on polygamy. they also agreed that blacks and whites were not equal in ALL respects. they emphatically agreed that the races should not mix, but Lincoln argued that the races would not mix ONLY if they were equal.
He was absolutely right to do because the edit was issued under his authority to suppress rebellion. He had no similar authority to make such a proclamation applying to areas that were not in rebellion at the time.Regardless of how you may feel about the morality and desirability of such an act, the fact is that applying it only to those states which were rebelling was legal, and applying it to the non-rebellious slave states (Kentucky, Missouri, etc.) would not have been.In practice it made little difference. Only about a quarter of the slaves in the US were outside "rebellious territories", and they were freed slightly more than two years later anyway by the Thirteenth Amendment. The real benefits to the US were:1. Logistical. Slaves which came into the hands of Union forces no longer needed to be treated as "enemy contraband" and either held or returned to their masters; they were simply free citizens.2. Political. Making the war explicitly about slavery made it much more difficult for anti-US elements in the UK and France (both of which had already outlawed slavery) to justify supporting the Confederacy, and effectively removed the (already slim) risk that those countries would decide to intervene in the conflict in any significant way.
It would not be correct to say that at all. The Southern states were fighting to try to preserve the relationship between the several states and between the states and the central government that they thought had always existed. They were trying to avoid having to accept what they feared were significant changes to those relationships. Thus they were not conducting a revolution at all. they were conducting a rebellion for conservatism. Also, the "sore point" being slavery was still very Constitutional. The American Revolution was a war to be independent of a semi-monarchy, not the case with the US Civil War.---It would be correct to say for a few reasons actually. They broke away from their nation, similar to the way the colonies did. That one fact is what makes the two relatively close. The Confederates created their own government, constitution, and army. Like the British, the North saw it as just a rebellion. The South also seceded from the Union for similar reasons. They felt they did not have the right to govern themselves. They also felt they had no voice in the national government when Lincoln was elected. In fact, one could say they actually did have their right and voice in both occasions, but they still felt that way. Had the Civil War been successful, the connection between the two would probably feel stronger.But, with that said, the American colonies were "owned by Great Britain, just as they owned Canada. The 11 Confederate states were members of a government they helped create. This makes the American Revolution very unique compared to the US Civil War.
It is similar because a mission can be told too.
One way in which the Sepoy Rebellion in India and the Boxer Rebellion China similar is that they attempted to
How are Shays Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion similar?"
The Sepoy Mutiny was a rebellion against the British in India, and the Boxer Rebellion was against Great Britain and ten other imperial nations in China. There are many differences, but both were prompted by a feeling of intrusion by foreign culture.
· Boxer Rebellion
The opposite of dissimilar is similar.
Similar means the same or alike, and dissimilar is the opposite of similar.
Washington's strong response to the Whiskey rebellion showed that the federal government was in charge , could and would enforce the laws passed by Congress, including the unpopular whiskey tax. The rapid put-down of the rebellion gained the presidency new respect and made similar rebellion more unlikely.
Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebellion , Monster , Jigoku Shoujo and Spiral ; they all have similar themes .
Dissimilar means not alike or different. The prefix DIS means NOT, and SIMILAR is, well, similar.
similar fraction is the same denominator and dissimilar fraction is cannot the same denominators
Not similar; unlike; heterogeneous; as, the tempers of men are as dissimilar as their features.
Well, similar means the same and dissimilar means different, so the difference is that they are different.