First. some of the northern states were also slave states. Second, much of the slave trade and slave ships were operated by Northerners. Finally, the north purchased tobacco and cotton that were produced by slave labor.
The answer is north. North is against slavery.
If you mean the American Civil War, it was between the North and the South (states) and the North won. This brought about the end of slavery.
There was slavery in the north for the same reason there was slavery in the south, that is to work at labourous jobs.
The North never had slavery.
the north's views on slavery were ngative and they wanted it abolished. that is why slaves went to the north when they ran away.
Yes, slavery was prevalent in North Carolina. Enslaved people were used for labor on plantations, farms, and in households throughout the state. The North Carolina economy was heavily dependent on slavery, particularly in the production of crops such as tobacco and cotton.
No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery
the north did. the south had slavery, the north did not.
North Carolina was deeply involved in slavery and in indentured servants. The 1860 US Census recorded over 300,000 or about a third of the states population as slaves. In addition that same census recorded 30,463 free people pf color residing in the state.
The answer is north. North is against slavery.
If you mean the American Civil War, it was between the North and the South (states) and the North won. This brought about the end of slavery.
Europe, Africa, Asia, and North America were the continents directly involved in the Columbian Exchange.
The Missouri Compromise primarily involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri.
The Missouri Compromise primarily involved the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri.
There was slavery in the north for the same reason there was slavery in the south, that is to work at labourous jobs.
Hugh Williamson was a signer of the United States Constitution and a prominent North Carolina delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. There is no direct evidence to suggest that he was involved in slavery. However, as a plantation owner in North Carolina, it is likely that he may have benefited from the institution of slavery in his personal life.
The North never had slavery.