The economy of the South was dependent upon slave labor.
The south was against slavery.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
yes slavery was good for the south
The South favoured slavery
Both had slavery, the south just had it for longer.
South Carolina and Georgia
Export of cotton, which was heavily dependent on slavery.
Charles Pinckney was for slavery. As a plantation owner in the South he was highly dependent on slaves, he owned 52 himself. Also his state, South Carolina, was dependent on the work of slaves for the economy.
The south was against slavery.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
yes slavery was good for the south
The South favoured slavery
They did not want slavery in the south they wanted to be apart of slavery.
Both had slavery, the south just had it for longer.
The sentence that supports the idea that the economy of the South revolved around agriculture and slavery might state that "the Southern economy was largely dependent on cash crops like cotton and tobacco, which were cultivated through the labor of enslaved people." This highlights the central role of agricultural production and the reliance on slavery as a labor system in the South's economic framework.
Yes. The South was pro-slavery, while the North was anti-slavery. Hope this helps!
the north didnt want slavery but the south want slavery