He would use section 8 of the amendment.
None. The controlling principles in Gibbons v. Ogden were already established. The Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) authorized Congress to control commerce between the states (including navigable waters); the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declared the Constitution was the supreme law of the land, and superseded state laws.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Ogden's attorneys argued:The Court should interpret "commerce" narrowly.New York, as a sovereign state, was entitled to regulate commerce within its borders.New York had the right to grant Ogden an exclusive legal franchise in Hudson Bay and New York Harbor, which were both under the purview of the state.Anyone who wanted to operate a steamboat in New York water had to pay for the privilege.New York laws did not interfere with the federal government's right to regulate commerce.New York and the federal government had concurrent power over commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
gibbons v. ogden
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The commerce clause
None. The controlling principles in Gibbons v. Ogden were already established. The Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) authorized Congress to control commerce between the states (including navigable waters); the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declared the Constitution was the supreme law of the land, and superseded state laws.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The case changed history by giving defined borders for implied powers in the Constitution. Gibbons v. Ogden specifically invoked the Interstate Commerce Clause for the first time.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
Aaron Ogden (1756- 1839) was a US Senator and 5th Governor of New Jersey. He was also the respondent in the landmark Supreme Court case Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824), in which the Court held Congress has sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8).
The US Supreme Court found in favor of Gibbons, establishing an historical precedent that Congress was specifically granted the right to control commerce between states in the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3).Article I, Section 8, Clause 3"Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes."Further, Article I, Section 9, of the US Constitution prohibits the states from regulating each other, which was part of the issue in Gibbons v. Ogden.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Its didnt. It was Gibbon vs. Ogden 1824
Toby Ogden's birth name is Tobias Ogden.
It is named after a guy called Peter Skene Ogden. ^ |
it gave congress authority or to override state law to regulate commerce
The address of the Ogden Union Station is: 2501 Wall Avenue, Ogden, UT 84401
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during the Gibbons vs Ogden Case. This landmark decision invoked that the power to regulate interstate trade was granted via the constitution.
Ogden Nash's birth name is Nash, Frederic Ogden.