None. The controlling principles in Gibbons v. Ogden were already established. The Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) authorized Congress to control commerce between the states (including navigable waters); the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declared the Constitution was the supreme law of the land, and superseded state laws.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The State of New York argued it had the right to regulate its own waterways as a provision of the Tenth Amendment, asserting it possessed the sovereign authority to control its territory before the Constitution was ratified, and had not expressly ceded this right to the Federal government. According to the Tenth Amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."
Chief Justice John Marshall countered that the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) authorized Congress to control commerce between the states (including navigable waters); and the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declared the Constitution was the supreme law of the land, superseding state laws where the two interests are in conflict.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
gibbons v. ogden
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
President James Monroe was in office in 1824. John Quincy Adams won the Presidential election that year, but didn't take office until March 4, 1825.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states
ruling* Gibbons v. Ogden*
Reversed- judgement in favor of Gibbons
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)Plaintiff's Counsel (Gibbons)William WirtDaniel WebsterRespondent's Counsel (Ogden)Thomas Addis EmmetThomas J. Oakley
Gibbons v Ogden
gibbons v. ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was argued before the US Supreme Court on February 5, 1924, and the Court released its decision on March 2, 1824. Gibbons established Congress had sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
pota
pota
pota
This helped advance the principle of national supremacy.
Gibbons v. Ogden
Gibbons v Ogden