None. The controlling principles in Gibbons v. Ogden were already established. The Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) authorized Congress to control commerce between the states (including navigable waters); the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declared the Constitution was the supreme law of the land, and superseded state laws.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
gibbons v. ogden
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
President James Monroe was in office in 1824. John Quincy Adams won the Presidential election that year, but didn't take office until March 4, 1825.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states
ruling* Gibbons v. Ogden*
Reversed- judgement in favor of Gibbons
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)Plaintiff's Counsel (Gibbons)William WirtDaniel WebsterRespondent's Counsel (Ogden)Thomas Addis EmmetThomas J. Oakley
Gibbons v Ogden
gibbons v. ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was argued before the US Supreme Court on February 5, 1924, and the Court released its decision on March 2, 1824. Gibbons established Congress had sole constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
Gibbons v. Ogden
pota
This helped advance the principle of national supremacy.
pota
pota
Gibbons v Ogden