0
In McCulloch v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court declared that a state cannot tax a national bank. In explaining the decision, Chief Justice of the United States John Marshall declared that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy" meaning that if an individual state were allowed to tax a national bank, it could tax it so heavily that it would destroy it, and no individual state should have the power to destroy an institution that had been created by the U.S. government.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who were the major players in the McCulloch v Maryland case?
Chief JusticeJohn Marshall................Federalist PartyAssociate JusticesBushrod Washington.....Federalist PartyWilliam Johnson............Democratic-RepublicanHenry B. Livingston.......Democratic-RepublicanThomas Todd................Democratic-RepublicanGabrielle Duvall.............Democratic-RepublicanJoseph Story.................Democratic-RepublicanCase Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
What did mcculloch v Maryland and gibbons v ogden have in common?
They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states
Where was the Location of the first national bank?
lagos state
Why did the anti federalists want a state bank?
The Anti Federalist wanted a state bank due to the fact that they were against the National Bank. They believed that the state should have the power to the bank, and by having a National Bank, the National govermenet would be gaining to much power.
Who created the national bank?
Henry Clay
How did McCulloch v Maryland in 1819 maintain the Constitution as the supreme law of the land?
It declared the state of Maryland did not have the right to tax the national bank.
How did McCulloch v. Maryland maintain the Constitution as the supreme law of the land?
Help Me !!(It declared the state of Maryland did not have the right to tax the national bank.)
How did McCulloch v Maryland 1819 maintain the Constitution as the supreme law of the land?
Help Me !!(It declared the state of Maryland did not have the right to tax the national bank.)
Which Supreme Court case prevented states from taxing the federal government?
McCulloch v. Maryland prevented states from taxing the federal government. The state of Maryland was trying to impose a tax on all bank notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. At the time, the only bank of this sort in Maryland was the Second Bank of the United States.
Who is James W McCulloch?
Mathew Mcculloch is the guy that had the first wine suck.
What did the supreme court case McCulloch v Maryland settle?
McCulloch v. Maryland settled that the National Bank was constitutional. Also it settled that Maryland does not have the power to tax a institution created by congress.
Who were the parties in McCulloch v Maryland?
The parties in McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819) were:James McCulloch, manager of the Second National Bank of the United States, in Baltimore, MDThe State of MarylandJohn James, intervenor (James brought the original suit in Baltimore County court as an intervenor, hoping to be awarded half of the Second National Bank's back taxes.)Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, John James, 17 US 316 (1819)McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819) [shorter title]
What court case declared the national bank to be constitutional?
None. The US Supreme Court declared Congress had the constitutional authority to establish a national bank to handle the United States financial transactions under the Necessary and Proper Clause in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).In other words, the Supreme Court declared the national bank constitutional, not unconstitutional.
What role did James McCulloch play in McCulloch v. Maryland 1819?
James McCulloch was cashier and head of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of The Second Bank of the United States who refused to pay a new tax the State of Maryland attempted to impose on the bank. McCulloch was the nominal defendant in Maryland's case against the federal government in the state courts, and the petitioner in the US Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information about McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Links, below.
In McCulloch v. Maryland why did the state of Maryland bring suit against a U.S. branch bank in Baltimore?
This branch bank refused to pay certain taxes levied against the bank
How did McCulloch v Maryland strengthen the federal gov't at the expense of the state gov't?
Maryland wanted to tax the National Bank, but John Marshall (Supreme Court Justice) ruled that states could not tax a federal association.
What was the Supreme course ruling that defended federal power by denying a state the right to tax a federal bank?
McCulloch v Maryland; implied powers
