0
What else can I help you with?
What would decide weather slavery would be allowed in a territory idea of popular sovereignty?
By the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, voters in the US territories would decide whether the "soon to be state" would enter as a free state or a slave state. This Act was the result of Senator Stephan Douglas's ideas to solve the slave-free state crisis.
What was Prior to the Civil War many people thought the issue of slavery should be based on popular sovereignty which meant that?
Prior to the Civil War, many believed that the issue of slavery should be determined by popular sovereignty, which meant that the residents of a territory should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow or prohibit slavery. This concept was intended to resolve conflicts over slavery's expansion into new territories and states by allowing local voters to make the choice. However, it ultimately led to increased tensions and violence, as seen in events like "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed over the issue.
Did the north or the south say the right of slavery is the right of a state to decide?
Congressmen from the South were the first proponents of allowing the voters of a State decide the free or slavery issues. An amendment was bitterly passed however that when slaves reached the age of 25, they would be freed.
What territory is Kansas?
The territory of Kansas, to the West of Missouri, was admitted to the Union under a local vote that would decide whether it would be a slave-state or a free state. This system attracted every bully-boy from both sides, to cross into the state and intimidate voters. The ensuing period of violence was known as 'Bleeding Kansas'.
Why did antis slavery and pro slavery groups encourage people to move to Kansas?
At best - to buy cheap properties that would entitle them to vote on whether Kansas should be slave or free. At worst - to intimidate voters and try to declare the ballots to be rigged.
What was the law that allowed voters to choose whether to allow slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed voters in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in territories north of a certain latitude.
Believers in popular sovereignty proposed that the future of slavery in a territory should be decided by?
a territory's voters
What would decide weather slavery would be allowed in a territory idea of popular sovereignty?
By the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, voters in the US territories would decide whether the "soon to be state" would enter as a free state or a slave state. This Act was the result of Senator Stephan Douglas's ideas to solve the slave-free state crisis.
What did the Kansas Nebraska act gave voters in Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to do?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act, enacted in 1854, granted voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to decide whether to allow slavery within their borders through the principle of popular sovereignty. This meant that the settlers of each territory would determine the status of slavery, leading to significant conflict and violence, particularly in Kansas, which became known as "Bleeding Kansas." The act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had previously prohibited slavery in those territories.
Who believes that voters should be given the right to decide if slavery would be permitted or banned?
The belief that voters should decide on the legality of slavery aligns with the views of proponents of popular sovereignty, particularly during the mid-19th century in the United States. This concept was notably championed by politicians like Stephen A. Douglas, who advocated for allowing territories to decide for themselves whether to permit or ban slavery through local votes. This idea was a significant aspect of debates leading up to the Civil War, as it aimed to resolve the contentious issue of slavery's expansion into new territories.
What was the belief that voters should be given the right to decide if slavery would be permitted or banned?
popular sovereignty
Is where voters in a new territory decided if they wanted to ban or allow slavery?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857 established that territorial voters did not have the authority to ban or allow slavery; this decision held that Congress was the sole authority on the issue of slavery in the territories.
A proposed law or constitutional amendment the legislature ask voters to decide on?
In some states, an automatic ballot referrals allows voters to decide at regular intervals whether to hold a convention.
What were the main issues decided by the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
Whether to allow Slavery in the new states obtained in the Louisiana Territory and specifically in Kansas and Nebraska. The method used was to allow the voters of the states decide the slavery question as a step towards admission to the union. Nebraska was pretty much anti-slavery so the idea was OK there, but things were different in Kansas. The election produces a bloody battle and all sorts of conflicts and attempts to rig the election.
What allowed voters to decide issues?
Who allowed voters to decide issues
What did the Kansas-Nebraska act give voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to do?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 granted voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery through the principle of popular sovereignty. This meant that the settlers in those territories could vote on the legality of slavery, leading to significant conflict and violence, particularly in Kansas, as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed. The act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had previously restricted slavery in those regions.
What was Prior to the Civil War many people thought the issue of slavery should be based on popular sovereignty which meant that?
Prior to the Civil War, many believed that the issue of slavery should be determined by popular sovereignty, which meant that the residents of a territory should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow or prohibit slavery. This concept was intended to resolve conflicts over slavery's expansion into new territories and states by allowing local voters to make the choice. However, it ultimately led to increased tensions and violence, as seen in events like "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed over the issue.
