No. He represented the slave state of Maryland in Congress, and during debate on amending the tax provisions of the Articles of Confederation -- in what became the forerunner to the notorious 3/5 clause in the Constitution -- he offered an even more extreme version: that a slave should be worth 1/4 of a free man. (March 28, 1783)
The south was against slavery.
He was against slavery, because he was on the union side. The union side was against slavery.
The Union (North) was against slavery while the Confederate (South) was against slavery.
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
The answer is north. North is against slavery.
yes he was
yes he is.
Daniel Carroll died in 1796.
Daniel Carroll was born in 1730.
Eleanor Darnall Carroll
Eleanor Darnall Carroll
Daniel Carroll, a Founding Father and signer of the U.S. Constitution, had complex views on slavery and the slave trade. While he personally owned slaves, he expressed concerns about the moral implications of slavery and the potential divisive impact on the nation. Carroll's stance reflected the broader tensions of his time, as he recognized the economic benefits of slavery but also acknowledged its ethical dilemmas. Ultimately, he supported gradual emancipation and the idea that the nation should work toward ending the slave trade.
he was white
He has two children.
Daniel B. Carroll has written: 'Henri Mercier and the American Civil War' -- subject(s): Foreign relations
Daniel Carroll was a significant figure at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, representing Maryland. He was one of the few delegates who actively participated in the debates and discussions surrounding the formation of the new government. Carroll was a proponent of a strong central government and played a role in shaping the compromises that addressed issues such as representation and slavery. His contributions helped lay the groundwork for the federal structure that defines the United States government today.
M. Daniel Carroll R. has written: 'Amos-- the prophet and his oracles' -- subject(s): Criticism, interpretation, Bible