answersLogoWhite

0

If you're doing the crossword, the Dred Scott descision.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History

Did the dred Scott decision angered the north?

It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.


In the North riots broke out in large cities in which poor men angered at unfair discrimination protested the draft.?

True


How did the dred Scott decision lead to the civil war?

The Dred Scott decision of 1857 intensified sectional tensions by ruling that enslaved individuals were not U.S. citizens and had no rights to sue in federal court, effectively declaring the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. This ruling angered abolitionists and undermined the political compromises aimed at resolving disputes over slavery. The decision galvanized anti-slavery sentiment in the North and emboldened pro-slavery advocates in the South, deepening the divide between the two regions and contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War.


How did the dred Scott decision help start the civil war?

It drove the two sides further apart. The Supreme Court declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. This delighted the South as much as it angered the Abolitionists.


What was the impact dred Scott v. Sandford on north- south relations and why?

The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision in 1857 intensified sectional tensions between the North and South by ruling that African Americans could not be citizens and that Congress had no authority to regulate slavery in the territories. This effectively nullified the Missouri Compromise and angered many in the North who saw it as a pro-slavery ruling that undermined free soil principles. The ruling galvanized anti-slavery sentiments and contributed to the rise of the Republican Party, further polarizing the nation and setting the stage for the Civil War.

Related Questions

Did the dred Scott decision angered the north?

It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.


What did actions did Lincoln take that angered the Democrats of the North?

ghuon


Why were abolitionist angered by the Dred Scott decision?

Because the decision showed that the Supreme Court didn't think that any State could outlaw slavery.


Why was worried about winning re-election in 1864?

Because the North was angered by the war.


Why were republicans angered by the dred Scott V. Sandford decision?

Because it declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.


In the north riots broke out in large cities in which poor men angered at unfair discrimination?

TRUE


Was angered when MacArthur demanded an unconditional surrender from North Korea from the North Korea war?

Harry Truman was angered when MacArthur demanded an unconditional surrender from North Korea during the Korean War. Harry Truman fired MacArthur after a congressman received a letter from MacArthur stating this idea. MacArthur knew that this would be a way to prolong the war in Korea.


In the North riots broke out in large cities in which poor men angered at unfair discrimination protested the draft?

True


In the North riots broke out in large cities in which poor men angered at unfair discrimination protested the draft.?

True


Why was the north angered with the fugitive slave law?

Because the Declaration of Independence said that every man in America was free.


What groups did Millard Fillmore anger?

Fillmore angered the abolitionists and other anti-slavery groups in the North, by the Fugitive Slave Act, which was part of the Compromise of 1850. This compromise was engineered by Henry Clay. It was opposed by Fillmore's predecessor, Taylor.


Was roger taney for the dred Scott decision?

Yes, the elderly Taney was Chief Justice, and he had framed those words about the status of black people that so angered the Abolitionists.