During the framing of the Constitution, smaller states were afraid of not being equally represented. A compromise was to give each state to senators regardless of their size
The central conflict of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was how representation in the US Congress was going to be determined. The combating sides were states with large populations vs states with smaller populations. Eventually, a compromise was reached, which is known as the Great Compromise.
Large and small states
three-fifths compromise
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, solved the issue of how the states were represented in congress. Resolved in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Great Compromise solved the problem of representation for smaller states by having Congress have two senators for the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on population of the state.
The bigger states opposed the New Jersey plan and the smaller states opposed the Virginia plan. IDK which states liked/dislike the great compromise.
The Great Compromise, The Three-Fifths Compromise and other smaller compromises were made in the creation of the Constitution.
The central conflict of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was how representation in the US Congress was going to be determined. The combating sides were states with large populations vs states with smaller populations. Eventually, a compromise was reached, which is known as the Great Compromise.
It helped get the constitution approved by the smaller states who now felt equal to the larger ones
it is shorter smaller try it out
There was conflict between the least populated states and greatly populated states in terms of representation. If too much representation was given to the big states, the smaller states there would be an imbalance of power. In addition to this, there was also conflict between those who wanted slaves to count for representation power. The result of that conflict was the Three-Fifths Compromise. In many senses, the constitution was a compromise on many fronts.
Benjamin Franklin played a crucial role in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 by serving as a mediator and a symbol of unity among the delegates. His experience and diplomatic skills helped to ease tensions between differing factions, particularly between the larger and smaller states. Franklin's commitment to compromise, exemplified in his support for the Great Compromise, facilitated the creation of a balanced federal system. Additionally, his advocacy for a strong central government and the protection of individual rights influenced the framing of the Constitution itself.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, played a crucial role in securing the support of nine of the thirteen states for the Constitution. It established a bicameral legislature, combining proportional representation in the House of Representatives with equal representation in the Senate. This compromise addressed the concerns of both larger and smaller states, balancing their interests and enabling a more unified agreement. Additionally, the inclusion of the Three-Fifths Compromise helped to resolve disputes over how enslaved individuals would be counted for representation and taxation purposes.
There was conflict between the least populated states and greatly populated states in terms of representation. If too much representation was given to the big states, the smaller states there would be an imbalance of power. In addition to this, there was also conflict between those who wanted slaves to count for representation power. The result of that conflict was the Three-Fifths Compromise. In many senses, the constitution was a compromise on many fronts.
When writing the constitution the southern states had the slave population while the northern states didn't and the compromise was added so when counting the population for House representation that the slaves wouldn't be counted as a whole person. The smaller northern states were afraid that the larger south would have too much power in Congress.
The law was placed in the constitution to count slaves as 3/4 of a person when counting population for the House of Representatives. This was a compromise between the large southern states with large slaves populations and the northern colonies who were smaller in populations.
Chiefly the admission of California - whether it wouls slave or free. The rest of the compromise was cobbled together with smaller deals.
He voted in favor of the Conneticut Compromise (The Great Compromise) he signed the Constitution. He was against slavery because North Carolina was a large state and the smaller states wanted to count them as people for there population. (They came up with the 3/5 Compromise). Because the Virginia plan allowed the bigger states to have more power. You sign a paper that says you are for/against what you are voting for. Experts don't know if they signed at the Convention in Penssylvania in 1787 or not.