The full answer to this question would encompass enough information to fill a book, and has.
To put it as simply as possible; US Army General Custer under estimated the size, strength and tactics of a group of Native American's (Sioux & Cheyenne) and the ensuing battle resulted in a complete victory by the Native Americans.
Custer made the error of splitting his forces and the troops under his direct command fell under attack of Sitting Bull and his warriors. The numbers of fighters on each side has been disputed but for arguments sake Custer had 200 plus troopers and Sitting Bull had about 4,000 warriors (this is one estimation ). Within about 45 minutes, Custer's troops were wiped out to the man. A number of military historians do not consider this to be a battle because of the length of time and the numbers of cavalry troops involved. They have used the word "confrontation" rather than battle.
West point museum
no it was not
Black Hawk
discovery of gold in South Dakota
in the battle of little bighorn
Battle of the Little Bighorn happened on 26-06-25.
Battle of the Little Bighorn.
That was the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
George Custer and his entire regiment died at the battle of Little Bighorn.
It was the destruction of nomadic Indian tribes by an organised army hitting their homes, women and childre rather than their warriors. A shameful episode in US history. If it happened in this day and age the world would be in uproar protesting it.
Battle of Rosebud.
Gold was discovered in the Black Hills of South Dakota in 1875. There are no Black Hills in North Dakota. The battle also known as "Custer's Last Stand" was the "Battle of the Little Bighorn" and it occurred in Montana Territory in 1876.
you
the Battle of Little Bighorn
there was a newspaper
sitting bull
the US